SWC75
Bored Historian
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 33,987
- Like
- 65,552
Once again I decided to look at excerpts from my pre-season football preview and , four months later, comment on what I had right and what turned out to be wrong.
Then:
The staff may have been learning on the job but they did a fine job on the recruiting trail, securing a full class of commitments at the earliest date ever. They are already working toward the 2016 class. It’s a sign the program is on the rise. The reason we joined the ACC is because it meant more money and we’re using that to upgrade the facilities, (again). The future looks bright. People are anticipating the next “breakthrough season” when we again thrust Syracuse, NY into the football limelight….
Now we are in a conference division with a locked and loaded perennial national power, Florida State and another strong program in Clemson. I think Louisville has the potential to at least be at Clemson’s level. They will certainly be better than the school they replaced, Maryland. Several of the teams we played in the conference last year had suffered significant injuries to their offensive teams and we were able to beat NC State 24-10, Wake Forest 13-0 and Maryland 20-3. That saved us from what was going to be a disastrous season. We can’t depend on such good fortune this year. And there’s another division in this conference, one with Miami. You know they’ll come back just like Florida State did. They are in the right place and have the right history. If we ever found a way to win our division, they’d likely be waiting for us. I think this places a glass ceiling on what can accomplish that wasn’t there before. We may have another “breakthrough year” but it’s more likely to be 11-2 than 11-0.
And It’s not going to be this year. Not yet.
Now:
It sure wasn’t. The team got off to a stumbling start, then got crushed by the injury bug and we finished 3-9. Many fans were willing to give the coaching staff a pass because of the injuries but many were not, feeling that there was more wrong than that. The team never seemed very potent or efficient, even when healthy and the excessive conservatism in the decision making, (such as punting in the other team’s territory) was very frustrating to watch.
It was particularly frustrating to watch all of the top college games at the end of the season and see really dynamic offenses at work. Even Alabama and Texas Christian, who had been known for winning the old fashioned way with defense and the running game, were playing games with scores like 55-44 and 58-61. Meanwhile we were scoring 7-10 points a game, punting form the other team’s 30 yard line and “hoping for a turnover”. I’ve commented that football is undergoing the sort of transformation in our time that basketball did in the 1940’s: from 40-30 games to 80-70 games. Basketball coaches of the time had to adjust or lose their jobs. Our coach, who made his name as a defensive coordinator but who once was a quarterback, will have to adjust as well or his tenure here will be a failure. Either Tim Lester will have to be a revelation next year or we need to get someone who knows how to run a dynamic offense in here to be a coordinator, (probably either a positon coach at a high scoring FBS school or a coordinator at a high scoring FCS school), or we need to replace Shafer with one, (probably an FBS coordinator or an FCS head coach from a school that’s been lighting up the scoreboard). But we need to get away from punt and hope they turn it over football.
The conference proved to be stronger than last year, largely because all those injuries that crippled other teams hit un s instead. The ACC is an unforgiving conference for a team on Syracuse’s level. You need to be good to compete. When you fall back into mediocrity or worse, that will translate into losses.
In the meantime, the best thing that was happening with the Syracuse program- the increase from year to year in the talent level due to better recruiting classes- is threatened by this. Shafer demoted his offensive coordinator, George MacDonald, who was also his leading recruiter, with a specialty in bringing recruits from Florida, the place everyone goes to get the sort or speedy, athletic players that are needed to compete in a conference like the ACC. Will MacDonald, who came here to be a coordinator, now leave? Our offense didn’t get better after Tim Lester took over. Was the switch a mistake? How will the 3-9 record, in which our only wins were over FCS Villanova, an injury crippled Central Michigan team and Wake Forest, the only team in the ACC worse than we were, impact recruits decision? Finally, with all the discontent and resulting speculation over how long Shafer will be here and who might replace him, will that bring recruiting to a halt. That’s what happened with Paul Pasqualoni and Greg Robinson. It could certainly happen again. It’s vitally important that we prove next year that this year was an anomaly, not the beginning of a trend.
So we’ve gone from wondering when the breakthrough will take place to wondering where we are and where we are going.
Then:
The staff may have been learning on the job but they did a fine job on the recruiting trail, securing a full class of commitments at the earliest date ever. They are already working toward the 2016 class. It’s a sign the program is on the rise. The reason we joined the ACC is because it meant more money and we’re using that to upgrade the facilities, (again). The future looks bright. People are anticipating the next “breakthrough season” when we again thrust Syracuse, NY into the football limelight….
Now we are in a conference division with a locked and loaded perennial national power, Florida State and another strong program in Clemson. I think Louisville has the potential to at least be at Clemson’s level. They will certainly be better than the school they replaced, Maryland. Several of the teams we played in the conference last year had suffered significant injuries to their offensive teams and we were able to beat NC State 24-10, Wake Forest 13-0 and Maryland 20-3. That saved us from what was going to be a disastrous season. We can’t depend on such good fortune this year. And there’s another division in this conference, one with Miami. You know they’ll come back just like Florida State did. They are in the right place and have the right history. If we ever found a way to win our division, they’d likely be waiting for us. I think this places a glass ceiling on what can accomplish that wasn’t there before. We may have another “breakthrough year” but it’s more likely to be 11-2 than 11-0.
And It’s not going to be this year. Not yet.
Now:
It sure wasn’t. The team got off to a stumbling start, then got crushed by the injury bug and we finished 3-9. Many fans were willing to give the coaching staff a pass because of the injuries but many were not, feeling that there was more wrong than that. The team never seemed very potent or efficient, even when healthy and the excessive conservatism in the decision making, (such as punting in the other team’s territory) was very frustrating to watch.
It was particularly frustrating to watch all of the top college games at the end of the season and see really dynamic offenses at work. Even Alabama and Texas Christian, who had been known for winning the old fashioned way with defense and the running game, were playing games with scores like 55-44 and 58-61. Meanwhile we were scoring 7-10 points a game, punting form the other team’s 30 yard line and “hoping for a turnover”. I’ve commented that football is undergoing the sort of transformation in our time that basketball did in the 1940’s: from 40-30 games to 80-70 games. Basketball coaches of the time had to adjust or lose their jobs. Our coach, who made his name as a defensive coordinator but who once was a quarterback, will have to adjust as well or his tenure here will be a failure. Either Tim Lester will have to be a revelation next year or we need to get someone who knows how to run a dynamic offense in here to be a coordinator, (probably either a positon coach at a high scoring FBS school or a coordinator at a high scoring FCS school), or we need to replace Shafer with one, (probably an FBS coordinator or an FCS head coach from a school that’s been lighting up the scoreboard). But we need to get away from punt and hope they turn it over football.
The conference proved to be stronger than last year, largely because all those injuries that crippled other teams hit un s instead. The ACC is an unforgiving conference for a team on Syracuse’s level. You need to be good to compete. When you fall back into mediocrity or worse, that will translate into losses.
In the meantime, the best thing that was happening with the Syracuse program- the increase from year to year in the talent level due to better recruiting classes- is threatened by this. Shafer demoted his offensive coordinator, George MacDonald, who was also his leading recruiter, with a specialty in bringing recruits from Florida, the place everyone goes to get the sort or speedy, athletic players that are needed to compete in a conference like the ACC. Will MacDonald, who came here to be a coordinator, now leave? Our offense didn’t get better after Tim Lester took over. Was the switch a mistake? How will the 3-9 record, in which our only wins were over FCS Villanova, an injury crippled Central Michigan team and Wake Forest, the only team in the ACC worse than we were, impact recruits decision? Finally, with all the discontent and resulting speculation over how long Shafer will be here and who might replace him, will that bring recruiting to a halt. That’s what happened with Paul Pasqualoni and Greg Robinson. It could certainly happen again. It’s vitally important that we prove next year that this year was an anomaly, not the beginning of a trend.
So we’ve gone from wondering when the breakthrough will take place to wondering where we are and where we are going.