If you were making a list of the all-time greatest players in NBA history (based on whatever metrics you choose), who would you rank higher - Bird or Duncan? And why?
Bird.If you were making a list of the all-time greatest players in NBA history (based on whatever metrics you choose), who would you rank higher - Bird or Duncan? And why?
Bird.
no explanation necessary.
Bird. The truly greats are memorable. Within 10 years after Duncan retires the only time Duncan will get mentioned is when people are talking about great players that nobody ever seems to talk about.If you were making a list of the all-time greatest players in NBA history (based on whatever metrics you choose), who would you rank higher - Bird or Duncan? And why?
This, but Duncan is definitely in my top 10. He's still the best player in the NBA from the era that comes between Jordan and LeBron's dominance IMO.
better than shaq and/or kobe?
Duncan was/is a great player but its Bird. If he had a good back he would have played 3 more seasons.
my argument against Kobe is that you can easily argue he may never have been the best perimeter player in the league for any one year of his career.
Who would you say were better perimeter players?IMO, yes. Shaq was definitely more dominant, but Duncan won more rings and MVPs with a lesser supporting cast. The Kobe/Duncan argument would probably take too long for me to get into, but basically, my argument against Kobe is that you can easily argue he may never have been the best perimeter player in the league for any one year of his career. And Duncan basically singlehandedly carried the Spurs to one or two of his rings, whereas Kobe did it with Shaq and Gasol. Kobe's play generally got worse when he reached the playoffs whereas Duncan elevated his play.
Duncan was/is a great player but its Bird. If he had a good back he would have played 3 more seasons.
Wow, that's interesting. I would actually argue that Kobe was the best perimeter player in the league every season from about 2000-2001ish thru when Lebron overtook him in the late-2000s.
I'd say Bird as he's got a little more versatility. But if the Heat win the championship this year (and I think they will), Lebron passes them both. That makes this Celtics fan sad.If the Spurs were to win, I may have to move Duncan ahead of Bird.
Before the Lebron prime of 2007- to present Duncan was the most valuable player in the NBA. He won 4 rings in SA basically by himself with help from Tony Parker, and Manu Ginobili. San Antonio was a Derek Fisher miracle shot in 2004 and a stupid foul on Bruce Bowen in the last 10 seconds of game 7 against Dirk Nowitski in 2006 from winning 4 titles in a row. With Tony Parker before his prime, Bruce Bowen, Ginobili, and Duncan as the main cogs. edit: David Robinson was a role player 2 championships and Robert Horry was a role player for 2 championships.better than shaq and/or kobe?
I actually think if Bias didn't die you would have seen Bird transform his game to become a better passer. Also he would have benefited from not being the center of attention in his later years with Bias by his side.And if Bias hadn't died, it would have been three fewer.
There is no shame in Kobe being 2nd to either of those guys as all 3 are top 10 NBA players all-time.
Who would you say were better perimeter players?
If Kobe, Bird and Duncan are all top 10 all-time, who amongst this group is outside the top 10?
MJ, Magic, West, Oscar, Lebron, Russell, Wilt, Shaq, Kareem, Olajuwon.
I think Lebron passed him closer to the middle of the decade, call it about 2007 or so? That's probably splitting hairs though.
I would agree that Kobe was probably the best perimeter player in the middle of the decade. T-Mac was pretty great for a year or two there though.