Hard for me to relate, since I had the package season tickets for basketball and football, but I'll add my two cents.
Night classes draw some students away from mid-week games. That's not very big, but it's something. There's also other events that occur on campus; things like greek events and stuff.
Sometimes after a long day of work/class, students would simply just rather watch it on TV in their warm dorm/apartment.
If I understand correctly, big east games are 26$ for students. Might not seem like a lot but to the average, casual SU student/fan, you pick and choose your games. 26$ is a few weekends of drinking if you plan accordingly.
And yes, I think SU does a horrible job at making it easy for students to attend the games.
Respectfully disagree with some of that.
Regarding night classes, ostensibly a similar number of students had the same Wednesday night classes last year, when almost 28,000 people showed up for Georgetown at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday night for Game 17 (the same time, day, and game as last night).
It seems that there is a core of diehards who go to all or most games, and then a couple thousand who get excited about Georgetown but don't care about Providence or Notre Dame. Some on here have speculated that that's because SU draws heavily from the Northeast and more kids are raised as professional fans who don't really have a tie to the college game but can be persuaded to go to the big event. Don't know if that's so, but it's reasonable.
Also, single-game tickets are high. But aren't those for the very casual fans? If you're an SU student who actually roots for the team, I can't imagine that you'd buy single-game tickets.
I think my colleagues who buy the football/basketball season package pay $100 or $150 for that privilege. While it wouldn't be fair to comment on whether or not that's prohibitive for many students, it's certainly a far cry from $26 per game.
Finally, I think there's something to the idea that we're all spoiled. Too many great regular seasons in a row + four losses + huge exodus of seniors and other talent = decreased attendance. And this is historically the case re: talent exodus - same thing happened after 1990, 1996, 2000, and 2005. Fans build interest following Coleman, Wallace, Hart, Warrick, or Scoop; then interest is bound to wane after their senior-year attendance spike.
The first-semester schedule stunk - very few games with students on campus - so it may have been more difficult for students to build an attachment to the team, but I don't know enough to blame the school for that. A lot of those scheduling matters are out of their hands. Not sure how the school could do a better job in actually getting kids in the seats (short of mandating a dead period for student clubs and activities during game times or something similarly autocratic).
Edit: One more thing, regarding Greek events. Last year's Saturday afternoon West Virginia game would ordinarily be a sure-fire 30,000 crowd. It wasn't; the student section was two-thirds empty. Evidently rush events were scheduled that day. Dumb, right? Hopefully they wouldn't repeat that mistake.
This season we were on the road for the last weekend of rush; St. John's was in the Dome the next weekend. Guaranteed 30,000+. And we drew 1,000 fewer than we did for WVU last season.
So Greek events hurt, without a doubt. But there's something else at play this season.
Why do you think the students are not coming to the games? I am especially curious about the expense of the tickets. I have heard that the school does NOT give the students a break, price-wise. (We already know they shafted them with the seats!) If it's the discouraging ticket prices, it seems the administration could be pressured to do something about that. I would suggest a public shaming. But perhaps it's something other than money.
Please, enlighten us! We await your responses with bated breaths (and some with beer breaths).