Top 5 of the Last 50: SU Quarterbacks | Page 3 | Syracusefan.com
.

Top 5 of the Last 50: SU Quarterbacks

McCord over Mcnabb is wild, man
I'd pick McNabb first but I think that McCord was the first QB in a long time that gave me confidence on 3rd down (long or short) that we would get the first down. For a long time I dreaded third downs. For me, that probably gives him a boost.
 
Last edited:
Todd Philcox is always underrated. In 1988 SU was 10-2, Ranked #12. Imagine if he was able to start for 2 or 3 years - he would be ranked with Graves and MacPherson. I have to have him in the top 5 over Dungey. He went into Beaver Stadium and methodically took PSU apart. Did the same to SEC-Champion LSU in the bowl game. Granted he was on a talented team. 6-4 218. 9 years in the NFL.

There are a lot of parallels between Dungey and Bill Hurley. Both easily in the top 10, along with Nassib.

Interesting among the names being discussed above outside of the top 5, no mention of Garrett Shrader.
 
Todd Philcox is always underrated. In 1988 SU was 10-2, Ranked #12. Imagine if he was able to start for 2 or 3 years - he would be ranked with Graves and MacPherson. I have to have him in the top 5 over Dungey. He went into Beaver Stadium and methodically took PSU apart. Did the same to SEC-Champion LSU in the bowl game. Granted he was on a talented team. 6-4 218. 9 years in the NFL.

There are a lot of parallels between Dungey and Bill Hurley. Both easily in the top 10, along with Nassib.

Interesting among the names being discussed above outside of the top 5, no mention of Garrett Shrader.
Good point about Shrader. If I had to add another it would be him. I would put him 10th.
 
McPherson not getting the Heisman was the second biggest SU Heisman snub second only to Jim Brown...who also lost out to the Notre Dame HYPE Machine, I believe Paul Horning won in 57 for a very unimpressive Notre Dame squad!!!!
Something like 2 wins. He shouldn't even have been on the ballot.
 
McCord over Mcnabb is wild, man
To each their own. Leading the nation in passing in a new offense (to McCord) is insane. What he did for our program in one year was off the charts. If you were asked which player was a better pro prospect, that would be McNabb easily. All of those 5 were outstanding for the Cuse.
 
I'd pick McNabb first but I think that McCord was the first QB in a long time that gave me confidence on 3rd down (long or short) that we would get the first down. For a long time I dreaded third downs. For me, that probably gives him a boost.
I would say Dungey and Graves did the same, they just did it differently. McCord stands out because we've missed it for so long.

I feel like Graves legacy has been unfortunately forgotten over time. He set passing records for us that stood for quite a while despite us being a run heavy team due to coaching philosophy, not ability. He was the QB for two 10 win teams, incuding the last top 10 team we've had. He got preseason Heisman hype prior to his senior year. It never came to fruition, not because he stumbled, he had his best statistical year in most ways, but because we were retooling the defense and changing defensive philosophies.
 
Last edited:
I would say Dungey and Graves did the same, they just did it differently. McCord stands out because we've missed it for so long.

I feel like Graves legacy has been unfortunately forgotten over time. He set passing records for us that stood for quite a while despite us being a run heavy team due to coaching philosophy, not ability. He was the QB for two 10 win teams incuding the last top 10 team we've had. He got preseason Heisman hype prior to his senior year. It never came to fruition, not because he stumbled, he had his best statistical year in most ways, but because we were retooling the defense and changing defensive philosophies.
I think Graves was great. I have him at 4 and the top 4 are all debatable in terms of ranking IMO. However, I would not put Dungey in that group. He wasn’t a good passer and i think Graves was a better runner. Dungey was super injury prone too. He took some nasty illegal shots to the head too. I like Dungey… just not top 5. I didn’t have the same confidence on 3rd down with Dungey as I did with McCord. McCord was money.
 
To each their own. Leading the nation in passing in a new offense (to McCord) is insane. What he did for our program in one year was off the charts. If you were asked which player was a better pro prospect, that would be McNabb easily. All of those 5 were outstanding for the Cuse.
The thing when comparing those two though is that McNabb was also the more recognized college player. He was the 3 time Big East offensive player of the year when the league was still good and he finished 5th in Heisman voting. You can argue McCord had the more impressive stats, but you shouldn't do that without understanding the difference in offensive philosophies. Even in '98 there were guys with more impressive stats that weren't as highly thought of.
 
I think Graves was great. I have him at 4 and the top 4 are all debatable in terms of ranking IMO. However, I would not put Dungey in that group. He wasn’t a good passer and i think Graves was a better runner. Dungey was super injury prone too. He took some nasty illegal shots to the head too. I like Dungey… just not top 5. I didn’t have the same confidence on 3rd down with Dungey as I did with McCord. McCord was money.
I think Dungey was a better runner than Graves, but Graves was better at everything else. Overall as a QB Dungey is behind both of those guys.

I was specifically talking about the confidence on 3rd down part. His senior year he was really good at it, especially with his feet. I can understand having more confidence in McCord though. I think it's hard to separate QB from system though. We were so much better at staying on schedule with Nixon than we were with the Dino offenses.

What does Nixon do with Dungey? We probably see more running, probably read option, and fewer passes, but still a very good offense. Maybe we'll find out this year what it may have looked like.
 
I think Dungey was a better runner than Graves, but Graves was better at everything else. Overall as a QB Dungey is behind both of those guys.

I was specifically talking about the confidence on 3rd down part. His senior year he was really good at it, especially with his feet. I can understand having more confidence in McCord though. I think it's hard to separate QB from system though. We were so much better at staying on schedule with Nixon than we were with the Dino offenses.

What does Nixon do with Dungey? We probably see more running, probably read option, and fewer passes, but still a very good offense. Maybe we'll find out this year what it may have looked like.
Idk Graves was such a smooth runner running the option. Dungey was more of a physical runner. Both very good. It's too bad Graves' senior year played out the way it did. His junior year was great. That 2nd half vs Miami was great, just wish Gedney had been able to gain 3 more yards...
 
Idk Graves was such a smooth runner running the option. Dungey was more of a physical runner. Both very good. It's too bad Graves' senior year played out the way it did. His junior year was great. That 2nd half vs Miami was great, just wish Gedney had been able to gain 3 more yards...
It's hard to compare since Dungey didn't run the traditional option. His running was so often off script. Graves was really good at it. I loved watching him pitch it at the perfect time. When I look back at his stats, I'm surprised at how few rushing yards he had. I suppose that's very much a function of him being so good at pitching it.
 
The thing when comparing those two though is that McNabb was also the more recognized college player. He was the 3 time Big East offensive player of the year when the league was still good and he finished 5th in Heisman voting. You can argue McCord had the more impressive stats, but you shouldn't do that without understanding the difference in offensive philosophies. Even in '98 there were guys with more impressive stats that weren't as highly thought of.
Not sure there is a right or wrong answer here. Many angles to take into consideration. McNabb was throwing to Marvin Harrison in his first year. Some decent but not superstar receivers after that. McCord's receivers were darn good imo. Jury is still out on how good though. In my mind they were pretty darn good.
 
Not sure there is a right or wrong answer here. Many angles to take into consideration. McNabb was throwing to Marvin Harrison in his first year. Some decent but not superstar receivers after that. McCord's receivers were darn good imo. Jury is still out on how good though. In my mind they were pretty darn good.
I think McCord probably had more options. Some of that is probably a result of the design of the offense too. McNabb had Johnson after Harrison, who ended up a second round pick, and Spotwood was stud before his injury, but not a lot of depth after that. The offense didn't really have check down options built into it, so that made McNabb have to hold the ball more and gave him fewer options to unload it in the face of a rush or good downfield coverage. Most of our passing was downfield with the running game setting everything up. I would love to see McNabb in modern offenses that would've featured his running more instead of mostly treating it as an escape hatch.
 
I would probably say his potential was equal, but Dungey had that one healthy elite year that Shrader didn't have. That gives him the edge for me.

Shrader's numbers (including W/L) are actually better.
But Dungey beat Clemson and won 10 games.
Shrader never had that signature win or signature season.
Lots of "close but no cigar" games, and too many injuries.
Hard to believe but Shrader is 4th all time at Syracuse for rushing TDs.
 
Shrader's numbers (including W/L) are actually better.
But Dungey beat Clemson and won 10 games.
Shrader never had that signature win or signature season.
Lots of "close but no cigar" games, and too many injuries.
Hard to believe but Shrader is 4th all time at Syracuse for rushing TDs.
I looked at the numbers. I wouldn't say they're better. They're pretty much a wash. As a sophomore Dungey pretty much equaled Shrader's best passing year in only 9 games. He averaged over 290 ypg that year. Shrader's best was 220. Probably speaks to the differences in the offense/OC. Dungey's passing numbers went down after Lewis left. His worst passng year under Babers equaled Shrader's best. Shrader had better passer ratings.
 
For me Dungey will always have a place. It wasn't always about the stats it was his heart, determination, hustle and want to. The dude willed his teams and took them on his back countless times. The dude was just a winner by all accounts.
 
For me Dungey will always have a place. It wasn't always about the stats it was his heart, determination, hustle and want to. The dude willed his teams and took them on his back countless times. The dude was just a winner by all accounts.

You see, I had the same feeling about Shrader. It's just that he got hurt.
 
You see, I had the same feeling about Shrader. It's just that he got hurt.

Oh for sure he did it's just Dungey just had some moments where it was like he just did what jump knee kick, stole the ball after an interception, chased a side after a dude after an interception shoved him OB, literally lifted a guy off the ground Minnesota, many others. I liked Shrader but for me Dungey just had more about him probably because he was actually recruited to Syracuse from the get go and not a transfer.
 
I think he had some physical tools that were better than Dungey. I wish he could've stayed healthy.

I still find it kind of shocking that he finished as the #4 in rushing touchdowns for his Syracuse career.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
173,864
Messages
5,117,877
Members
6,072
Latest member
CheerMom12

Online statistics

Members online
195
Guests online
929
Total visitors
1,124


...
Top Bottom