Trust the sages

[Slugo]

I’ve followed this board from the beginning. I rarely comment. There are a rarified few that actually have inside information. They don’t divulge until cleared by their sources. That’s why they have access. We should all know who they are. Let’s call them the sages. The next level are speculators who may or may not have real experience in evaluating talent. Less reliable. Then there are the contributors who look at stats and clips and make profound statements based on that. As an SU journalism major, double check your sources.

 

[EnviroSciGuy]

I’ve followed this board from the beginning. I rarely comment. There are a rarified few that actually have inside information. They don’t divulge until cleared by their sources. That’s why they have access. We should all know who they are. Let’s call them the sages. The next level are speculators who may or may not have real experience in evaluating talent. Less reliable. Then there are the contributors who look at stats and clips and make profound statements based on that. As an SU journalism major, double check your sources.

 

[Brooky03]

Word

 

[atlanticuse]

Been drinking tonight, son?

 

[CuseTG2003]

Great use of the period

 

[Cusefan69]

I’ve followed this board from the beginning. I rarely comment. There are a rarified few that actually have inside information. They don’t divulge until cleared by their sources. That’s why they have access. We should all know who they are. Let’s call them the sages. The next level are speculators who may or may not have real experience in evaluating talent. Less reliable. Then there are the contributors who look at stats and clips and make profound statements based on that. As an SU journalism major, double check your sources.

 

[dwilmont44]

Sage Steele

 

[IthacaBarrel]

I’ve followed this board from the beginning. I rarely comment. There are a rarified few that actually have inside information. They don’t divulge until cleared by their sources. That’s why they have access. We should all know who they are. Let’s call them the sages. The next level are speculators who may or may not have real experience in evaluating talent. Less reliable. Then there are the contributors who look at stats and clips and make profound statements based on that. As an SU journalism major, double check your sources.

Gee thanks It's an internet fan forum, not the WSJ.

 

[ImperialOrange]

I thought this was going to be a thread about saging/smudging the dome... which honestly probably isn't a terrible idea given the horrors seen there for MBB and FB last year.

 

[UpstateSM]

 

[AlaskaSU]

We grow regular sage and creeping sage in our herb garden. My wife sometimes says a few words to them, but never about basketball.

 

[SUforme]

Someone was hitting the bottle I think...lol

 

[Eric15]

I’ve followed this board from the beginning. I rarely comment. There are a rarified few that actually have inside information. They don’t divulge until cleared by their sources. That’s why they have access. We should all know who they are. Let’s call them the sages. The next level are speculators who may or may not have real experience in evaluating talent. Less reliable. Then there are the contributors who look at stats and clips and make profound statements based on that. As an SU journalism major, double check your sources.

What’s the 4th level down below “contributor?” Thats probably where I reside and I’m quite comfortable with it.

 

[cayugacuse]

Been drinking tonight, son?

Truth serum.

 

[kingtidge]

My grandfather used to say "drunk is the way we are."

I was 7 and hopped up on kool aid.

 

[sdhall01]

What’s the 4th level down below “contributor?” Thats probably where I reside and I’m quite comfortable with it.

I’m figuring I might be below that level, the “jestergooners.”