"For UConn to be eligible in 2012-13, the NCAA would have to change its method and timetable for collecting and releasing APR scores so that eligibility in 2013 is based on the scores from 2010-11 and 2011-12, instead of 2009-10 and 2010-11. That is being studied and will be discussed at the NCAA meetings in February. Scores would have to be revealed before May, as is now the case. Failing that, there also will be appeals."
From the Courant...
http://www.courant.com/sports/college/hc-ncaa-emmert-1028-20111027,0,4087228.story
I think the ultimate in poetic justice would have been for them to miss the tourney this season when they pushed the rules to the brink to sign Drummond.
Remember when we failed on the rolling APR b/c of the loss of Harris, Flynn, and Devo before graduation... we lost 2 schollies. UConn has already lost 2 schollies this year for failing to meet rolling APR requirements. If Drummond leaves, and I believe he will, that will have to further impact their APR as well. I don't even pretend to understand the stupid APR thing anyway ... but I agree with Jordoo. I can't understand how Kentucky maintains their APR with all their one-and-doners!! Also I had read where UConn was supposed to have gotten their numbers above the required 900.
As usual I am confused by all this!!
What I wonder is,"How will this impact their recruiting" and the penalty would surely impact any consideration they might have had for entry into the ACC ... but maybe not. I know after our NCAA violations several years ago we had a couple of down years as I recall ... probably wrong on that too.
Got it ... figured out that after reading the new ruling. So as far as Kentucky goes all those one-and-dones were set up for basket weaving 101, basketball 101, etc ... they attended classes and got passing grades before they left for the NBA ... got it. I feel bad for UConn and I don't feel bad for UConn. I know they are going ballistic on their board over this. I feel bad for UConn b/c they are getting punished twice for their low APR .. they lost 2 schollies this year and now they face the loss of post-season tournament play for the same year for which they are now being penalized. I don't feel bad for UConn b/c they have demonstrated a recent history of circumventing those exact penalties that the NCAA laid down. If this goes through and the penalty holds for UConn I wonder how they will figure out how to circumvent it ... and they will.
What I wonder is,"How will this impact their recruiting" and the penalty would surely impact any consideration they might have had for entry into the ACC ... but maybe not. I know after our NCAA violations several years ago we had a couple of down years as I recall ... probably wrong on that too.
Aren't the current loss of scholarships there due to the NCAA infractions? The whole Miles recruiting mess? I believe they received 3 years of reduced scholarships as penalty for that.
No, it is due to the APR scores.
Oh ok, well either way then they have more reductions on the way still due to the Miles things. From Telep's article on Dirty recruiting-
"If you don't establish that deniability, you could get burned the way UConn recently was. The NCAA penalized the Huskies when their recruitment of Nate Miles became complicated by Josh Nochimson, a former team manager turned player agent who was pursuing Miles. Intentional or not, the violation cost UConn head coach Jim Calhoun a brief suspension, a three-season scholarship reduction and three years of probation."
I think it is 1 per year for 3 years due to the Miles thing but this year there is an additional 2 less for the APR.
SU paid a price for Harris, Flynn and Devo leaving at once. I always thought Devo had obtained his degree, but as I read the stories on APR it seems a school is penalized if a player leaves befor completing four years of playing degree or no degree.
Still it looks like Calhoun will need to change his tactics as he, more than any coach I recall, bullies kids off the roster on a regular basis.
Calhoun -since he has lost scholarships will simply have several new straight A student walk-ons to up the grades. No problem for him.