Inevitable, given the year he's had.
I, too, expect him to return next year--but if they win it all, I wouldn't begrudge him one way or the other.
I love CJ, but he'll never be anything more than a fringe NBA player.
look for CJ to enter his name and go through the NBA workouts and if then he is still looked at as a 1st rounder he should go if not withdraw his name and return to SU
Oh I totally agree. He's one of my favorites of all time and is a superb collegiate player. I see no reason why he won't be a 1st team All-American next year.Which, of course, has nothing to do with whether he's a great college player or not.
He'll play in the NBA. Whether he "stars" or not doesn't change how good of a player he's been throughout his Syracuse career.
They probably tell about 50 kids they're possible 1st rounders every year.
CJ does not have outside shooting range for the NBA level, his ball handling is not very good for an NBA SF, his passing ability is nonexistent. Defense is an unknown. I think he has the tools to be a good man defender, but you don't know.
I'm trying to figure out what the NBA would like about him to make him a first round pick, at this point. I'd say his ability to finish creatively when going to the hole, and "nose for the basket" and his leaping ability would seem to be his biggest pluses. And he has good intangibles in that he makes big plays when they are needed, and plays within himself and generally does things that he's good at, and doesn't do dumb things.
Obviously his shot has improved a ton at the college level, but it's not NBA level yet. Slow release, range, and ability to shoot off the dribble would all seem to be issues. He is getting there though. Anoher lefty, Michael Redd, was not known as a shooter in college and then developed into one of the best in the NBA, so with the way CJ is making a high % from outside now, I think it will be a bigger part of his game next year.
Honestly see him as a 2nd round pick as a senior type. Is he really any better of an NBA prospect than Joseph?
Fair is a very good college player, and one of my all time favorites. But he looks like an NBA long shot to me...though with another big imorovement from junior to senior year, he could make it.
Agreed. He doesn't have NBA potential either, for all the reasons you mentioned. We all know NBA tams will take chances on people they think have great potential, and unfortunately I don't see that for CJ.They probably tell about 50 kids they're possible 1st rounders every year.
CJ does not have outside shooting range for the NBA level, his ball handling is not very good for an NBA SF, his passing ability is nonexistent. Defense is an unknown. I think he has the tools to be a good man defender, but you don't know.
I'm trying to figure out what the NBA would like about him to make him a first round pick, at this point. I'd say his ability to finish creatively when going to the hole, and "nose for the basket" and his leaping ability would seem to be his biggest pluses. And he has good intangibles in that he makes big plays when they are needed, and plays within himself and generally does things that he's good at, and doesn't do dumb things.
Obviously his shot has improved a ton at the college level, but it's not NBA level yet. Slow release, range, and ability to shoot off the dribble would all seem to be issues. He is getting there though. Anoher lefty, Michael Redd, was not known as a shooter in college and then developed into one of the best in the NBA, so with the way CJ is making a high % from outside now, I think it will be a bigger part of his game next year.
Honestly see him as a 2nd round pick as a senior type. Is he really any better of an NBA prospect than Joseph?
Fair is a very good college player, and one of my all time favorites. But he looks like an NBA long shot to me...though with another big imorovement from junior to senior year, he could make it.
They probably tell about 50 kids they're possible 1st rounders every year.
CJ does not have outside shooting range for the NBA level, his ball handling is not very good for an NBA SF, his passing ability is nonexistent. Defense is an unknown. I think he has the tools to be a good man defender, but you don't know.
I'm trying to figure out what the NBA would like about him to make him a first round pick, at this point. I'd say his ability to finish creatively when going to the hole, and "nose for the basket" and his leaping ability would seem to be his biggest pluses. And he has good intangibles in that he makes big plays when they are needed, and plays within himself and generally does things that he's good at, and doesn't do dumb things.
Obviously his shot has improved a ton at the college level, but it's not NBA level yet. Slow release, range, and ability to shoot off the dribble would all seem to be issues. He is getting there though. Anoher lefty, Michael Redd, was not known as a shooter in college and then developed into one of the best in the NBA, so with the way CJ is making a high % from outside now, I think it will be a bigger part of his game next year.
Honestly see him as a 2nd round pick as a senior type. Is he really any better of an NBA prospect than Joseph?
Fair is a very good college player, and one of my all time favorites. But he looks like an NBA long shot to me...though with another big imorovement from junior to senior year, he could make it.
At this point in time, Joseph was a far better NBA prospect than Fair currently is. That's not to say Fair can't add to his game and become a better prospect, but I personally think he'll have a hard time making an NBA team unless he improves a lot. From an NBA player perspective, he has more negatives than pluses in my opinion.
Agreed. He doesn't have NBA potential either, for all the reasons you mentioned. We all know NBA tams will take chances on people they think have great potential, and unfortunately I don't see that for CJ.
I don't know that I agree with that assessment. CJ Fair does everything better than Joseph, with the lone exception of handling the ball in the open floor. He's superior in every other respect.
I expect CJ to show improvement vis a vis putting the ball on the floor this offseason. But in terms of him versus Joseph on the same point of their respective developmental curves [junior year], I'd say that CJ is out in front.
Your assessment could be dead on, but that doesn't mean I have to like it. I Love CJ, and I drink Orange Kool-Aid.
Unlike![]()
I would say Joseph had a better off hand and is a better passer than CJ.
Not that Joseph was a great passer or anything, but that aspect of CJs game doesn't really exist.
Joseph would over dribble and try to do things off the dribble that he wasn't quite capable of, which is more a problem with his decision making than his handle itself IMO. CJ's ability to go right is noticeably lacking, though it seems that it's starting to improve.
This.
To me, the three things Fair does better than Joseph at the NBA level are:
1. Low-post game
2. Rebounding
3. Defensive potential
But if we're considering them both to be SFs at the next level (which I think is where Fair will have to play), Joseph is better at:
1. Ball-handling by a good margin
2. Passing by a good margin
3. Creating his own scoring opportunities off the dribble by a pretty good margin
To me, the difference is that Joseph is better at the things that are important for a SF and at least semi-close in the things that Fair is better at.