atlanticuse
All Conference
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2022
- Messages
- 2,130
- Like
- 3,453
but it's 100% players, 0% coaching.More than any team. Next up? Tarleton state with UVA scoring 80. So to all that think Syracuse was good this year, let that sink in.
but it's 100% players, 0% coaching.More than any team. Next up? Tarleton state with UVA scoring 80. So to all that think Syracuse was good this year, let that sink in.
Our loss to them looks bad, however UNC won the regular season, NCst won the tourney. SU went combined 3-2 against them, beat the Pac 12 champ on a neutral and beat the Patriot League champ, albeit in a huge comeback. There were some moments this year.
I think UVA is sliding to mediocrity as fast or faster than we did with JB these last few years. I could just see the talent disparity in a game against Duke.
It's ok it's just the sickness of this board rubbing off on youFair point. I probably should’ve used the “you seem like you’d be a lot of fun at parties” line.
Sometimes when you win, you really lose, and sometimes when you lose, you really win, and sometimes when you win or lose, you actually tie, and sometimes when you tie, you actually win or lose. Winning or losing is all one organic mechanism, from which one extracts what one needs.
- Plato
yep. Final 10 really needs to be brought backAs of February 19, UVA was 19-5 and had won 8 games in a row. Since then they've gone 4-6 with three losses of more than 25 points. I wonder what their fans are saying...
Before the big ten tournament Wisconsin was in a free fall tooyep. Final 10 really needs to be brought back
If that was a patient, they were dead.
i'm calling time of death 14 :56 of the second half.If that was a patient, they were dead.
Well, here's what one said -As of February 19, UVA was 19-5 and had won 8 games in a row. Since then they've gone 4-6 with three losses of more than 25 points. I wonder what their fans are saying...
I don't make assessments until I've cooled off a bit from the heat of raw emotions. My belief is based on my view of the whole season (last night was "just another brick in the wall").
I always want the players in all our sports who come here to play to stay with us for as long as possible. That said, I really won't get very upset if any player who can return other than Blake Buchanan left. To me he's a work in progress and has a great potential (but as a certain C. Brown once said, "There is no heavier heavier burden than a great potential"). The others are replaceable. Don't get me wrong, I am NOT trying to drive them away, I just won't be that upset if they leave as some posters will be.
Tony now has 6 months to think about things that can fix this. I'd be very dismayed if folks think this will be easy. The "Tony has got this covered" crowd should have received a rude awakening by now that the fix won't be instantaneous. It should be obvious he can't make the ball go in the basket. Making some sacrifices on the "imperviousness" of the defensive scheme to bolster offense probably will be required. It very well may be that the entire structure has to be "stripped down to the studs" and completely reconstructed.
shot 25 % from the floor today .Well, here's what one said -
It actually was that high?shot 25 % from the floor today .
a lot of SU's issues this season were scheme-relatedUVA scored 42 points for the game, had 14 at the half. If you watched, I think it is reasonable to wonder how SU gave up so many points to an obviously flawed offensive team when others have completely limited them. It was a reminder that SU's defense was truly bad at times this past season. Yes, SU improved, and many other factors are to be considered, but they played terrible in their game vs UVA. And I also think of how everything relates to SU as I watch games. So, the OP might have been harsh, but I thought about his statement as well.
Well, here's what one said -
How did that happen? We played MTM, and had two NBA type guards to replace slow Joe????The game was December 2.
They shot 55% from 2 57% from 3 and 80% from the line.
For the season they shot 43%, 36%, and 64%.
If you adjust their shooting to the average for our game it would equate to eight fewer two point shots, four fewer three pointers, and three fewer free throws.
They basically scored 31 points higher than their shooting averages for the year in our game.
You asking how did we give up many less 3's this year and have a better defensive rating for the year?How did that happen? We played MTM, and had two NBA type guards to replace slow Joe????
Only for comparing teams with equal resumesyep. Final 10 really needs to be brought back
CorrectOnly for comparing teams with equal resumes
Sounds familiar.Well, here's what one said ... "It should be obvious he can't make the ball go in the basket. Making some sacrifices on the "imperviousness" of the defensive scheme to bolster offense probably will be required."
Like 5 years ago for us, he’s at the beginning stage, at least they’re getting there.Sounds familiar.
Sympathies for the beating, Hoo's.