H
HOFCeluck
Guest
Boy they sure did get a lot better since realignment. I wonder what Wright's secret is.
Boy they sure did get a lot better since realignment. I wonder what Wright's secret is.
I agree that it is really coincidental that nova got awesome, and PC and Xavier suddenly became really really good once realignment happened.
Granted, I don't think any of these teams suck by any stretch, and PC has legitimately gotten better, but something tells me that none of them are nearly as highly ranked if realignment didn't happen.
It's like the big east became a rich mans WCC and everyone keeps acting like its the old big east.
PC has a had star since they have gotten better. Kris Dunn is a special talent and is the reason PC has upped its game along with a good coach.I agree that it is really coincidental that nova got awesome, and PC and Xavier suddenly became really really good once realignment happened.
Granted, I don't think any of these teams suck by any stretch, and PC has legitimately gotten better, but something tells me that none of them are nearly as highly ranked if realignment didn't happen.
It's like the big east became a rich mans WCC and everyone keeps acting like its the old big east.
I agree that it is really coincidental that nova got awesome, and PC and Xavier suddenly became really really good once realignment happened.
thru the eye test
Agreed. And the new Big East has not performed well in the NCAA tournament. Somebody has to win that conference now that the big boys have left, and the result is that the entire league is overrated.
How the *** is Arcidiacono still there?
to an extent, yeah - but there are also too many people that seem to increasingly regurgitate kenpom without really watching the games - a good balance is neededNothing personal towards you at all, but I just hate the phrase "the eye test" that you always hear on ESPN. All the eye test means is that someone has an opinion that they can't back up using facts.
Sure did. Nova got annual losses to Syracuse, Louisville, UConn off their schedule. They are vastly over-rated/over-seeded every year now. What happens when they hit the NCAAT? Ouch happens.Boy they sure did get a lot better since realignment. I wonder what Wright's secret is.
Eye test to me means you see the talent on that team. Even though the team doesn't have the record you see the talent and know they can be really dangerous.Nothing personal towards you at all, but I just hate the phrase "the eye test" that you always hear on ESPN. All the eye test means is that someone has an opinion that they can't back up using facts.
If we got seeded with Nova the fact Arcidiacono has struggled against our zone is part of the reason I would be okay with matchup.How the *** is Arcidiacono still there?
I agree that it is really coincidental that nova got awesome, and PC and Xavier suddenly became really really good once realignment happened.
Granted, I don't think any of these teams suck by any stretch, and PC has legitimately gotten better, but something tells me that none of them are nearly as highly ranked if realignment didn't happen.
It's like the big east became a rich mans WCC and everyone keeps acting like its the old big east.
They won the games so you gotta giv them credit but the conference just seems artificially inflated. They belong as a P6 conference but the top teams just don't seem that good. Xavier is the exception I think they are better than Creighton from 2 years ago or any Nova team these past 3 years.What ever become of facts to support some of these claims?
The Big East is 26-17 (60% or 58% Rutgers Adjusted) against fellow P5 schools this year. That is pretty damn good -- not just some mid major. It means it is a major player and in the top half of major conferences. They were also 5-4 against the ACC this year. They proved themselves.
Is it re-alignment that allowed these schools to do well against schools from other power conferences?
Did the WCC ever accomplish anything close to this?
Did the WCC ever have 60% of it's members in the top 50 in KenPom rating?
Or is the eye-test that this conference sucks worth more than a 26-17 record?
They lost Oklahoma in Hawaii and @Virginia. They beat Xavier at home. Spilt with Providence and have a bunch of just decent not great wins.
This is why I wish the NCAAT selection committee would do rankings like the CFB playoff committee. The CFB playoff committee didn't just drop teams for losing games they looked the team's resume.
You can't tell me Villanova is the best team in college basketball right now thru the eye test or their resume. That is what is wrong with polling.. They are like sheep 99% of the time. If you lose you don't have to fall and if you beat mediocrity you just don't have to automatically slide up.
Nova got annual losses to Syracuse, Louisville, UConn off their schedule.
W/ all due respect, polls mean absolutely nothing.They won the games so you gotta giv them credit but the conference just seems artificially inflated. They belong as a P6 conference but the top teams just don't seem that good. Xavier is the exception I think they are better than Creighton from 2 years ago or any Nova team these past 3 years.
Xavier seems NC good the rest just seem like max sweet 16 teams.
If we got seeded with Nova the fact Arcidiacono has struggled against our zone is part of the reason I would be okay with matchup.
Plus Cooney has had good games against them the past 2 years.