One has a great coach.Just felt like pointing that out. Best or second best recruiting class every year vs. a team coming off probation with 7 healthy players that supposedly dropped the ball in recruiting every year for like 5 straight years.
One has a great coach.
And the other is in no danger of not making the tourney.
Rough schedule, but still, they should not have still been ranked.Also, Oklahoma was once 14-2 and in position for a 1 seed. They're now 16-10 and their next game is at Kansas.
Watching Kentucky, they don't even look all that talented.
I'm wondering if this means the NBA draft class is a bit overrated.Yeah, I’ve sort of thought that all year. College basketball is pretty meh this year. Not a lot of elite teams and players IMO. ACC is not good. Some of these other leagues are bad too. Right now I still think Villanova, MSU, and Arizona are all pretty good but there is a lot meh after that. Purdue has looked rough the last few weeks. The middle to bottom of all these leagues are bad.
I'm wondering if this means the NBA draft class is a bit overrated.
ACC is not good.
Yeah, I’ve sort of thought that all year. College basketball is pretty meh this year. Not a lot of elite teams and players IMO. ACC is not good. Some of these other leagues are bad too. Right now I still think Villanova, MSU, and Arizona are all pretty good but there is a lot meh after that. Purdue has looked rough the last few weeks. The middle to bottom of all these leagues are bad.
What is this based on? You keep posting that. What do you mean?
4 teams in the top 15. Or 4 teams ranked higher than Arizona, whom you seem to think is pretty good.
The ACC is down from last season, but still the best or second best conference. The problem is that all the ACC teams are pretty good and just beating each other up night to night. There are probably no elite teams, but a lot of good to really good teams. The ACC’s non conference record was stellar.Yeah, I’ve sort of thought that all year. College basketball is pretty meh this year. Not a lot of elite teams and players IMO. ACC is not good. Some of these other leagues are bad too. Right now I still think Villanova, MSU, and Arizona are all pretty good but there is a lot meh after that. Purdue has looked rough the last few weeks. The middle to bottom of all these leagues are bad.
The ACC is down from last season, but still the best or second best conference. The problem is that all the ACC teams are pretty good and just beating each other up night to night. There are probably no elite teams, but a lot of good to really good teams. The ACC’s non conference record was stellar.
I don't see them being first or second best. They certainly weren't last season. But that's the beauty of the tournament. We'll find out soon enough.
The ACC had six teams ranked in the top 20 when the NCAA tournament began last year. Only one of them made it out of the first weekend alive.
I don't see them being first or second best. They certainly weren't last season. But that's the beauty of the tournament. We'll find out soon enough.
So you’re saying the conference underperformed in the NCAA’s, despite haven’t the National Champion? The PAC 12 had 3 top 10 teams and only 1 made it past the the Sweet 16.