kirbivore
2019 Cali Award (Passing Yards)
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2011
- Messages
- 15,135
- Like
- 15,625
P should have been given another year and any reasonable person, with all the facts in front of them, would agree.
1. retain all those recruits (ray rice)
2. you don't fire a coach that late in the season when there is no good candidates available
3. the AD should be given some time to make an informed decision vs what they see in a bowl game
4. P should have been given the benefit of the doubt with the success he had over the 13 year period (in hindsight, he should have a statue in front of the dome).
Not sure why we argue this anymore. WE KNOW the alternative was bad. The status quo would have been better in 2005. I'm no P apologist but the facts are the facts as of Dec 2004 and whether that was the time to get rid of him.
Keeping P for one more year was not an option. You can't go into a season with a lame duck coach.
#1 No kid with other BCS options is going to commit to a team where the head coach may not be there next year. I'm not so sure Rice sticks around if P is in lame duck status.
#2 I agree where they screwed up was deciding way too late to make a change.
#3 The AD transition was also screwed up by taking place in the middle of the academic year. Gross should have taken over the summer before or after.
#4 He had a good run but a statue...I don't think so.