stuckinbig11
All American
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 4,287
- Like
- 7,265
Totally unfair. Did you ever watch Southerland on defense? His long arms were everywhere.Dirty was a shooter, and only a shooter.
Totally unfair. Did you ever watch Southerland on defense? His long arms were everywhere.Dirty was a shooter, and only a shooter.
I liked the kid and was never pissed that he left. It has been a few years, but I can't remember a lot about his game that impressed me.Exactly. People are still pissed he left. Love James but its not even close as to who is the better overall player. Donte's one and only year he was given the green light by JB to put it up since there was little else.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
So hak had more talent but donte had more skilled, yet donte was taller bigger and younger! You comparing a 4 year player vs a one and done. If you compare freshmen Hak to freshmen donte it is and "Lol" comparison.Why the lol? You asked who was the better talent. Not who had more basketball skills. Hak didn't have a lot of pure skills. But he had some unique skills that made him a very good college player and attractive to the NBA. There were a couple things he could do that few could. But as a shooter, ball handler or passer? Not a lot there. So I still say Hak to your question.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The Donte v. James one is easy - Donte by a mile.
Ask yourself this, if we traded this year's James straight up to the team that Donte was on, how do those teams change?
Also, can you imagine if Donte got to only be a sixth man and a heat check guy rather than trying to shoulder a whole team?
Flynn v. MCW is tougher and would depend on the makeup of the team. I'd probably give the edge to MCW just due to his height at the top of the zone and the long arms to fill passing lanes, but Jonny was a pit bull out there and wasn't scared of anyone.
The Donte v. James one is easy - Donte by a mile.
Ask yourself this, if we traded this year's James straight up to the team that Donte was on, how do those teams change?
Also, can you imagine if Donte got to only be a sixth man and a heat check guy rather than trying to shoulder a whole team?
Flynn v. MCW is tougher and would depend on the makeup of the team. I'd probably give the edge to MCW just due to his height at the top of the zone and the long arms to fill passing lanes, but Jonny was a pit bull out there and wasn't scared of anyone.
OK, now that's a point that makes me rethink my position. Swap in James and that 2008 team looks really bad. Though I feel the same way about making that swap on the 2013 team, too.
I don't get this spacing the floor business. Donte started 35 games alongside a point guard who shot around 35% from 3. He spent 9+ with Devendorf, who shot ~41%, 10 with Scoop, who shot like he was attempting a soccer throw-in, but then 15 more along Harris, who shot about 32%. That's not a backcourt of Matt Roes, but wasn't the gang that couldn't shoot straight. South had two guards who couldn't get out of the 20s. He had the more difficult go of it in terms of spacing and reliance on his teammates and still shot a higher percentage from the floor and from 3.
Not even close between Donte and James. Donte is a much better all-around player. James was not a good defender, and was a horrible rebounder for his size and athletic ability.
Donte would have stayed if not for family pressure. He really enjoyed SU and the college atmosphere (he's a lot like Rak in that respect) He'd be a much better player today if he didn't go early and ride the bench.
MCW vs Flynn is a good one. I'd take healthy Jonny by a nose (but MCW is a much better fit for the NBA) because of what he could do to college point guards.
Here is all you need to get, a senior James didn't stat last year a freshman Donte would have. Case closed NC #2 delivered.
100% agree with all this.
Nah, you can't claim that.
You've got me on the gut-feeling "Hmm, 2008 would have been worse with South instead of Donte," but the whole starting honor is dependent on a lot of different things. And it's not necessarily indicative of talent, either: remember Dion over Triche.
But Southerland was a terrific defender. And he played primarily at the 3, so "horrible rebounder" doesn't fit, either.
But Southerland was a terrific defender. And he played primarily at the 3, so "horrible rebounder" doesn't fit, either.
Late to the party here... but here's my two cents. Donte was on a horrid team. There was no one else. He had the green light (which most folks here hated him for). He was a frigging freshman! With no supporting cast. If he had stayed (which he decided not to do because of seriously bad family circumstances), he would have been one of the best Orangemen ever. And he loved SU as much as anyone who ever played here (e.g, all the times he's come back). Let's hear a little love for Donte.
Late to the party here... but here's my two cents. Donte was on a horrid team. There was no one else. He had the green light (which most folks here hated him for). He was a frigging freshman! With no supporting cast. If he had stayed (which he decided not to do because of seriously bad family circumstances), he would have been one of the best Orangemen ever. And he loved SU as much as anyone who ever played here (e.g, all the times he's come back). Let's hear a little love for Donte.
You can have a green light and not have piss poor shot selection though
Neither demonstrated a handle at any point. No advantage for either player.
Can't find anything more up to date than this
Now, you might consider that a little misleading, since that includes guys who have been drafted and then sent there as kind of like a farm system thing, as opposed to working their way up through the D-league. The guy who was probably the most famous NBA player on the planet for a few months at the beginning of last year spent some time in the D-league, for whatever that is worth.
I seem to remember now the 23% number which is pretty good. And I would expect it to be heavy with the drafted players. As we all know, many, many guys are drafted on expectations of talent and if they can't out perform the current roster, then D-league sounds like a viable alternative. For some reason, I had this feeling that it was more like some of the old pro leagues were guys went to earn a pay check. However, when people say that guys should go D-league rather than college because they will get better training, I think that is over stating it because if only 1 in 4 get to the majors and most are draftees, then D-league isn't doing extensive development but more of polishing talent.