The original thread is from earlier this season when they were looking good but hadn't beaten Louisville yet, then the guy insisted they still weren't any good after they won the AAC in a more recent thread. I'm just curious if he still has that opinion following the bowl win. Is he capable of saying he was wrong or is he just going to stay in a hole now because his ego won't let him eat crow? I, for one, if pressed, would have told you I didn't think they were that good prior to the season, if only because I didn't know anything about them and made the mistake of going on reputation.
I just found him. He commented about Cooney in a basketball thread. Good call.
Is it the all-knowing TBCuse11?
It wasn't you that I was referring to. I don't think anyone suggested UCF should've been a national championship contender, but this guy said UCF flat out sucked and they wouldn't win one game in the ACC. The person he debated with contended they were a solid team and shouldn't be underestimated. This was all before they beat Louisville. After the Louisville win he still could not admit that they were a quality team. Any team that ends the season with 1 loss and beats 2 other ranked teams, one in a bowl game, should be viewed as a good (maybe not great) team.
Apparently he doesn't want to talk about it since I referenced it in a b-ball thread and received no response.Yes it was TBonehead11 and he debated with myself and someone else but it is really irrelevant now since they rode a crappy AAC schedule to a BCS game and beat a Big12 champ ... like we've done that a bunch of times ... they must suck LOL
I remember reading the exchange. I knew nothing about them. If I had been asked by a stranger prior to reading things on here, I would've assumed they sucked, but certainly would've changed my mind after the Louisville win. They have nothing to apologize for. Won their league with only 1 loss and won a BCS bowl against a top 10 team. Every team but the factories will take that every year.
