Bevo, I stand by my position, but I have said all I am going to say on this matter other than to acknowledge that your criticisms are fair.Moqui...I like most of your posts and respect you as a valuable poster..but, saying...
"in this case? yes, I will, even though it will probably earn me a ban. and, please, stop with the "he called it." Yes, he has legit sources, but not on this. He made 500 different predictions and dropped the money innuendo at the last minute just to cover his azz."
On the one hand you say that someone who actually sees a bird swoop down and catch a fish is a witness and therefore credible, on the other you don't qualify your statement above in any way, and state that is was a "cover his azz" effort.
Do you know that as a fact? Do you somehow know from whom, what, and where Jake got that information? You're just as guilty making that unfounded speculative statement as the people you accuse of having no solid proof.
Hate to get into spitting contests on the internet, but I'm disappointed in that post.
might want to take an ethics course before you get out of college...Right now we're under far too much scrutiny with Fine/Fab/Drugs and whatnot. If we're gonna turn to the dark side, we should wait a few years for another school to become the bad guy du jour.
might want to take an ethics course before you get out of college...
maybe, but it's a good pedestal to be on. concerns me that so many people in the business world/entering the business world think it is easy to blur the rules, but then cry when they get caught.Is it lonely up there on your pedestal, mscanlo?
this is one of my biggest concerns about "pay to play"/subsidizing college athletes. if the ncaa can't control it right nwo when it is against the rules, how the heck are they going to control it when it is not?Maybe he doesn't want to blow the whistle and keep Noel from getting money? Maybe UCLA offered more?
I don't know either way; I 100% assume that players are absolutely getting money and there are a lot more violations going on than get reported. I have no proof and no idea exactly how it works, but it has been going on from the beginning of college sports, I see no reason to think it's stopped.
I remember in Fab Five, Mitch Albom relayed a story about how minutes before Chris Webber committed to Michigan, Chris's father got a phone call from someone with either Ole Miss or Miss State (can't remember which, his father was from Mississippi) offering him something like $150,000 to commit to their school.
Is it lonely up there on your pedestal, mscanlo?
maybe, but it's a good pedestal to be on. concerns me that so many people in the business world/entering the business world think it is easy to blur the rules, but then cry when they get caught.
didn't mean to call out just black knight, but although many are jokingly commenting, i question how many fans would really want to see SU cough up money to get players and think it is ok
no worries, all in good fun. but many people, not just su fans, think it is the way to go in college sports. living in SEC country, yu get the sense many people would be ok with "buying a program" for short-term successAgreed, and I'm partly joking. I also think there may be an "industry standard" of bending the rules that all major programs must partake in to be competitive/successful. Per Francis's post from earlier today, we seem to do better when we evaluate early (and accurately - our staff is amazing at talent evaluation) and close the deal before it gets too dirty.
Remember the old Tarkanian line" The NCAA is so mad at Kentucky, they put Cleveland State on probation"I'm saying why wouldn't the NCAA investigate this. Nevermind they're too busy investigating kids like Michael Oher because their parents might want them to go to a certain school.
Or Carlos Boozer's move to the RTP area and immediately finding a 6 figure job.Did they report this to the NCAA? Why are so many people trying to protect Kentucky?
might want to take an ethics course before you get out of college...