DoctahLexus
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Jun 8, 2018
- Messages
- 4,806
- Like
- 10,404
We have had teams with similar or higher levels of talent come up short of the final four year after year since 2013. This team had some flaws they had to overcome, including a horrible situation at ssdm with minimal depth and one of our only two quality guys going down late in the season. Along with Levine, we desperately missed Kohn, Stevens, Olexo, and Matt Wright in the middle of the field. Excellent talent in certain spots, but it was not a perfect roster filled with premiere talent top to bottom.
This might just be my imagination, but some of the same people putting blame on Gait here are elsewhere agreeing with takes that we have an overrated 22 at attack, no speed, and no more than one elite dodger. So which one is it? If the talent is overrated and the coach sucks, then how the hell did we make the final 4?? Personally I do not think this team was so perfect in the talent department that they were able to get to the final four with a figurehead coach who does nothing and doesn't care. I also don't think he loses minimal talent to the portal, has success bringing in recruits (the 2026 class is our highest rated in a while with no help from St. Petro) and brings in talent from the portal as well, if the vibe that parents and kids get from him is that he's an apathetic figurehead.
First final four in 12 years and people think it could have been done without the head coach. I think you have to step back and think about all the years of failure we have had in this spot, often with stacked teams full of promise. Nobody knows what goes on behind the scenes. Why do people assume the worst based on nothing in a year where we saw some actual success?
This might just be my imagination, but some of the same people putting blame on Gait here are elsewhere agreeing with takes that we have an overrated 22 at attack, no speed, and no more than one elite dodger. So which one is it? If the talent is overrated and the coach sucks, then how the hell did we make the final 4?? Personally I do not think this team was so perfect in the talent department that they were able to get to the final four with a figurehead coach who does nothing and doesn't care. I also don't think he loses minimal talent to the portal, has success bringing in recruits (the 2026 class is our highest rated in a while with no help from St. Petro) and brings in talent from the portal as well, if the vibe that parents and kids get from him is that he's an apathetic figurehead.
First final four in 12 years and people think it could have been done without the head coach. I think you have to step back and think about all the years of failure we have had in this spot, often with stacked teams full of promise. Nobody knows what goes on behind the scenes. Why do people assume the worst based on nothing in a year where we saw some actual success?