You mean when Tom Coughlin turned them into something , yea , I been around. I will ask you this ; Does ANY team in the ACC care if they play BC again in any sport?You obviously weren't around when B.C. had some good teams. They played us at the garden and it was packed. When the eagles are decent they draw more than enough. No one anywhere cares when you suck.
You mean when Tom Coughlin turned them into something , yea , I been around. I will ask you this ; Does ANY team in the ACC care if they play BC again in any sport?
I have real animosity towards SPITT . Like this upcoming BBall game at home . I hope Dixon's perm goes flat. BC , they are like an ex that you hope does well but have no real emotional struggle with at all.We did when we stopped. So there is that.
You mean when Tom Coughlin turned them into something , yea , I been around. I will ask you this ; Does ANY team in the ACC care if they play BC again in any sport?
I have real animosity towards SPITT . Like this upcoming BBall game at home . I hope Dixon's perm goes flat. BC , they are like an ex that you hope does well but have no real emotional struggle with at all.
Same question : Your the League commissioner and your on the clock to make your pick and you have to make a pick of a school from New England , who do you pick?It' a good school. We have lots of alumni and fans in Boston. And they were playing hoop and fb at a high level in 2003. When we lost them we lost both good games and a great regional game in one of America's great cities. That was my (extended) point earlier.
Attendance was 12,108. Major fail for the B1G...KaiserUEO said:Michigan @ penn st
That decision has already been made by the ACC. It would be the same today. B.C. was taken before us.Same question : Your the League commissioner and your on the clock to make your pick and you have to make a pick of a school from New England , who do you pick?
Nobody outside of BC alumni care a darn about BC sports or the ACC confernce .
That was before UCONN moved up in football , there would be a different outcome today.That decision has already been made by the ACC. It would be the same today. B.C. was taken before us.
You always employ emotional arguments. UCONN is a state university and is supported everywhere in the state of Connecticut and having won numerous championships in men's and women's basketball has fans all over the place.Nobody outside of Hartford gives a damn about UConn. So yeah BC still wins that argument.
Same question : Your the League commissioner and your on the clock to make your pick and you have to make a pick of a school from New England , who do you pick?
You always employ emotional arguments. UCONN is a state university and is supported everywhere in the state of Connecticut and having won numerous championships in men's and women's basketball has fans all over the place.
No there wouldn't.That was before UCONN moved up in football , there would be a different outcome today.
OK , I submit to your great logic.No there wouldn't.
Boston College is a nationally respected university. It does have a history of big wins in football. UConn has none. Boston is a rich city in both history and money. Uconn or hartford if you wish, not so much. There isn't a contest here, except in your mind. The ACC would take B.C. 100 out of 100 times. How many times does the ACC have to pass on UConn to get their message that no one wants them?You always employ emotional arguments. UCONN is a state university and is supported everywhere in the state of Connecticut and having won numerous championships in men's and women's basketball has fans all over the place.
Your logic is that they suck right now, and they do, so they wouldn't be the school to take. The Presidents look long term. Not right now. And there is no logical reason to take UConn over Boston College. Better city? Boston. more potential money to be had? Boston. Better school? Boston College. better woman's basketball team? UConn. No one other than UConn cares.OK , I submit to your great logic.
Well , those are valid points , although you left men's basketball , which Trump's those off cards. But there is room for both.Your logic is that they suck right now, and they do, so they wouldn't be the school to take. The Presidents look long term. Not right now. And there is no logical reason to take UConn over Boston College. Better city? Boston. more potential money to be had? Boston. Better school? Boston College. better woman's basketball team? UConn. No one other than UConn cares.
You always employ emotional arguments. UCONN is a state university and is supported everywhere in the state of Connecticut and having won numerous championships in men's and women's basketball has fans all over the place.
In 2003 UCONN did not have D1 football , ACC took BC for the New England market at that time. They were not going to take a second team from that region .No. The ACC had THREE chances to add UConn. In 2003, 2011 *and* 2013. Each time they choose someone else.
In 2003 UCONN did not have D1 football , ACC took BC for the New England market at that time. They were not going to take a second team from that region .