Guinness
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 12,162
- Like
- 20,628
Fixed for ya...
Yes. That is absolutely what I meant. Stupid autocorrect, lol. Thanks.
Fixed for ya...
I can't wait until he trips the wrong guy and gets one in the eye, that is the only way this dude is going to learn.
Obviously the kid has some problems...I don't hope that someone decks him, I hope he gets the help he needs and corrects these issues so someone doesn't deck him...I think this kid may have a legit mental issue and needs help...I don't think violence will solve the problem...
Some people have to learn the hard way, this is his 3rd time doing this, being yelled at or suspended isn't going to correct the problem, not saying I hope he gets hurt, but maybe getting a black eye would humble him.
Well how about getting him some help first and if that doesn't work then maybe the "hard way"? Your not saying you hope he gets hurt, then suggest he should get a black eye...which I think to most would entail getting hurt...:noidea:
Do you think after doing this three times, other corrective measures have not been tried? wow, if thats true I do not know what to think.
And leave opposing players play timid against him wondering if they too can be tripped and get seriously hurt.He is a dangerous punk on the floor now.I am responding to your last sentenceI, we, you have no idea what have been tried...I have an issue with going straight to using or advocating violence as a corrective tool against anyone, especially someone who could possibly need some mental help, withour first exhausting other options, and still would be hard pressed to support the violence option...Maybe he has received or is receiving help...but I think the public shaming and now the indefinite suspension is definitely a good next step rather than jumping straight to violence...the kid didn't murder someone or commit some type of heinous crime such as rape...he tripped another kid in a game, let's get some perspective here...
I, we, you have no idea what have been tried...I have an issue with going straight to using or advocating violence as a corrective tool against anyone, especially someone who could possibly need some mental help, withour first exhausting other options, and still would be hard pressed to support the violence option...Maybe he has received or is receiving help...but I think the public shaming and now the indefinite suspension is definitely a good next step rather than jumping straight to violence...the kid didn't murder someone or commit some type of heinous crime such as rape...he tripped another kid in a game, let's get some perspective here...
And leave opposing players play timid against him wondering if they too can be tripped and get seriously hurt.He is a dangerous punk on the floor now
Tripped someone repeatedly is not the same as simply tripping a guy. Pattern of behavior with no change in that behavior suggests a major problem, and I still say it is delusional to think that nothing was done to address that behavior.
Over the top comparisons to criminal behavior do not enhance the point you are trying to make. I think certain people only respond to physical retaliation.
Some people have to learn the hard way, this is his 3rd time doing this, being yelled at or suspended isn't going to correct the problem, not saying I hope he gets hurt, but maybe getting a black eye would humble him.
I grew up in the 50 and 60's. Things were different. A neighborhood kid was always kicking, tripping, punching others, until one day he tripped the wrong guy. Got his ass kicked... problem solved. Never tripped, punched or kicked anyone again.
Yes. That is absolutely what I meant. Stupid autocorrect, lol. Thanks.
That descalated quickly.
Here's a question.
Are we talking about after the first, second, or third time he did it?Here's a question.
If Allen played at SU...under the exact same set of facts...would Boeheim suspend him indefinitely as K did?
Seems more likely he'd let him play after the apology.
Not a big disciplinarian except for pulling offenders who make bad plays during a game.
Here's a question.
If Allen played at SU...under the exact same set of facts...would Boeheim suspend him indefinitely as K did?
Seems more likely he'd let him play after the apology.
Not a big disciplinarian except for pulling offenders who make bad plays during a game.
The coach who, when asked what he'd do with Michael Carter-Williams when presented with evidence that he was a thief, said "my hands are tied"?
I think we know the answer, unfortunately.
Essentially...he bought himself out of a criminal charge by making some kind of extra-legal deal.That didn't happen on the court, right in front of him.
3 separate times.
MCW was actually "punished" by L&T - he paid a fine, which is standard for that sorta thing. Why would anything else be necessary?