sez you, and you're biased
SU is a small private university located in a small, shrinking, aging city hundreds of miles from any major urban area. The basketball program was largely built by the current coach & is synonymous with his name. The fan base is rabid, considers themselves a blue blood program near peer with Duke, Kentucky, Kansas, etc and has very high expectations. Finish outside the top 4 in the conference, miss the tournament 3 out of 6 years & get to the second weekend only one of those times and you're considered a failure & run out of town.
U-Dub is the flagship state university, with deeper pockets, located in a large, growing, younger major city. It is more of a football school, has little basketball history to live up to and has reasonable expectations for the new coach. Finish in the top half of the conference, make the NCAAs 3 times in the next 6 years & the Sweet 16 once and he'll be considered a home run hire.
no brainer
I disagree with this conclusion.
The ACC, the Carrier Dome, the major league status of the program in CNY (as opposed to a dormant college program in a professional sports town) the very strong history of the program and the proximity to recruiting grounds such as Philly, NYC, Baltimore, DC et al make Syracuse University Basketball a much better job than the UW job.
I also disagree with the "pressure" to win notion.
From what I have read and from what my UW cousin tells me, UW fans are a bit dumbfounded by the hire - they are concerned that Hopkins has never been a HC and are very worried that he will lose a truly great recruiting class including Porter who I think is the HS player of the year.
There will be a lot of pressure on Hopkins to win quickly.
Furthermore, great jobs come with pressure. You don't turn down Alabama Football because of the intense pressure to win.
From his presser today we learned the following from JB: (1) the three-year deal two years ago was not his idea but the Chancellor's idea; (2) the three-year deal had nothing to do with the NCAA sanctions; (3) he is very happy now because he wants to continue to coach; (4) he feels better physically now than he ever has; (5) a guy should be able to coach into his eighties if he wants to and can do the job; and (6) he is more enthusiastic and excited about the program now than he ever has been.
Does any of this sound like a guy who relished retirement? Or was really prepared to leave next year?
Why would Mike Hopkins give up a job he has coveted for years while on the brink of actually getting it?
Why didn't SU try to match the UW deal?
Why didn't JB step down now and allow Hopkins to take over now? Or why didn't the University make the change now?
And, why did the Chancellor insist upon a three-year deal two years ago if it had nothing to do with the sanctions?
Why would Boeheim "agree" to the three-year deal if he wanted to continue to coach and the deal had nothing to do with the sanctions?
A lot of this doesn't really add up. But it certainly is interesting.