sabach
All American
- Joined
- Aug 30, 2011
- Messages
- 5,593
- Like
- 8,936
Right. His legal team did not earn their pay thereIt’s very unlikely that things are going to go your way when in your statement defending yourself you acknowledge having masturbated.
She didn’t. According to ESPN radio MSU knew about this in March. It just leaked overnight.Didnt Brenda Tracy lead the charge against the punt God?
Not defending Tucker at all, but why did she wait 8 months to report this to MSU?
I'm saying the call happened in April 2022 and she reported it in December 2022.She didn’t. According to ESPN radio MSU knew about this in March. It just leaked overnight.
It's going to be hard to say it's a work call when there were 20+ of them at night for over a half hour. This is where the story gets murky.Weird story. I think both sides are not completely telling the truth. And why would he as the obsessive one cut her off after the call? That being said I do believe what she claimed happened is in fact the case. Which means Michigan State is screwed.
I think he should be fired but they will owe him money. She admitted that they are friends so they would need to prove this call was a work call and not a friend call to get out of paying him. Which means they will end up settling with him. On top of that if they argue this is a work call, she can bring a suit against Michigan State and they will have to settle with her. A complete mess.
It's going to be hard to say it's a work call when there were 20+ of them at night for over a half hour. This is where the story gets murky.
I haven’t read the story but as a victim advocate, don’t you think she would be a bit beyond being groomed? Also, I always thought of grooming as being practiced on young people, not adults, particularly experienced adults.She is a former victim and victims advocate. That alone should have been where his judgment needs to be appropriate here and it was not. This wasn't two frolicking singles writing a romance novel. Dude was married and pursued. He also spent time it appears earning trust which could be argued as taking advantage of someone knowing their personal trauma.
Not sure how it will play out legally but him trying to argue about things being completely consensual - don't buy it. There is a manipulative/grooming of a former victim vibe here.