Powellfan
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Jul 16, 2014
- Messages
- 6,433
- Like
- 10,629
SU ran 3 lsms in 2019 (Fernandez, Kennedy and Fusco), but I don't think SU will run 3 if the third isn't really good. If we're unsure of the ability of a player, it seems unlikely they'll get much time if there are two guys in front of him at LSM.
SU also ran 3 lsms in 2008 (White, Hlawati and McGonigle).
The 2019 season is what made me think that running three LSMs was untenable, as I thought Fusco saw substantially less time than Fernandez or Kennedy. But if Clary, Page and Wykoff are the top three contenders, Desko would be relying on two redshirt freshmen and a DIII grad transfer, so having depth and different options probably won’t be a bad thing.
Really difficult to look down the road, but it strikes me that if the three mentioned above get the majority of the runs at midfield, and the three returning starters play at close, in 2022 only Wykoff would be guaranteed not to come back. SU has a lot of depth on defense and these young kids might have a hard time breaking through.
Of course there is a lot of unpredictably, the three starters on close could come back in 2022, or they could decline the extra year of eligibility (all three already had a true redshirt year) and there could be multiple spots open. Of course if that doesn’t happen and DiPietro, Murphy and Kennedy do come back, when they leave in 2023, you’d be dealing with a highly regarded recruiting class including Billy Dwan. I think a lot of these youngsters are talented, but they are really going to have to fight for playing time.