They offered, he said no. All time bet on yourself season by increasing the original offer by 2 years 150 million totalIt cost the Yankees $10million more a year than if they had extended Judge's contract last year. Dummies.
They should have appealed.Padres offered 10 years, $400 mil.
Judge turned them down.
Padres offered 10 years, $400 mil.
Judge turned them down.
for that price yes. Spend the money in other areas.,.,Would you have liked it if he was a SF Giant for the remainder of his career?
Why?
People say that he is good, but 1 WS appearance in like 20 years? That is what constitutes as good for the Yankees?
At least they didn't have to go to 10 years; that would have been crazy.
Carlos Correa, shortstop. The Giants gave 13 years. He's very good, but he's 28! How can the back end of that deal not be an albatross?Some pitcher just got 13 years, and I don't mean 'in jail'.
How do you pay a pitcher for 13 years ??? Did he just graduate from college?
Carlos Correa, shortstop. The Giants gave 13 years. He's very good, but he's 28! How can the back end of that deal not be an albatross?
they assume they’re getting crap at the end. But they make up for it by the value early on. Assuming 1 WAR costs about 8 million , and he’s a 5 war guy, the front half will pay for the backCarlos Correa, shortstop. The Giants gave 13 years. He's very good, but he's 28! How can the back end of that deal not be an albatross?
they assume they’re getting crap at the end. But they make up for it by the value early on. Assuming 1 WAR costs about 8 million , and he’s a 5 war guy, the front half will pay for the back
Here’s the problem. Someone will. You will miss out on every big ticket free agent. That’s fine if your organization doesn’t have the money to handle that. But for the deep pockets guys? It’s a different story . Think Boston made out by not paying Betts? They got crappy prospects (Jeter downs is baad) and essentially a league average player in Verdugo.If it was my money, I wouldn't be paying ANY of these guys past their 38th birthday.
Verlander might be an exception; he's almost like Nolan Ryan, still throwing heat at that age, and after Tommy John surgery just a couple years ago.
But otherwise, that's nuts. It's paying for past performance, box office appeal, how many jerseys you can sell; not if the guy can actually play at a level worth that amount of money anymore.
Here’s the problem. Someone will. You will miss out on every big ticket free agent. That’s fine if your organization doesn’t have the money to handle that. But for the deep pockets guys? It’s a different story . Think Boston made out by not paying Betts? They got crappy prospects (Jeter downs is baad) and essentially a league average player in Verdugo.
Hank is dead.They're always competitive enough that Hank doesn't lose money.
The Yankees do work deep into counts. They led the league in walks and were 8th in stolen bases.They need a couple contact hitters, though. The thing that made the late 90s Yankees so great was that they could play "National League" ball and scratch out runs. They made pitchers work deep into counts, batter after batter. They moved runners, stole some bases. They didn't just sit around and wait for the long ball, and had no "Plan B". The Yankees have been too dependent on hitting home runs for like the last 10 years. That's what I hate about modern statistical analysis and how it's changed sports.
Baseball as a whole has been too addicted to the long ball, hence the shift against left-handers. How long would the shift survive if lefties were willing to try to power bunt toward third? Are there any leftie .300 hitters (players whose "long ball" usually is a double to the gap) remaining?If that just got done, then that's terrific, and the Yankees will have excellent pitching, a very deep rotation if they stay healthy. Even a couple guys could get hurt, and they are 7 deep in starting pitchers.
They need a couple contact hitters, though. The thing that made the late 90s Yankees so great was that they could play "National League" ball and scratch out runs. They made pitchers work deep into counts, batter after batter. They moved runners, stole some bases. They didn't just sit around and wait for the long ball, and had no "Plan B". The Yankees have been too dependent on hitting home runs for like the last 10 years. That's what I hate about modern statistical analysis and how it's changed sports.
The Yankees do work deep into counts. They led the league in walks and were 8th in stolen bases.