Melancer46
Living Legend
- Joined
- Dec 1, 2011
- Messages
- 10,479
- Like
- 13,737
Just don't look at anyone else we've been connected to so far lolAlso saw he averaged 3 TO's a game, don't think that's too good based on his assist average.
Just don't look at anyone else we've been connected to so far lolAlso saw he averaged 3 TO's a game, don't think that's too good based on his assist average.
Love this kids hair. Definitely using that Soul Glo
If the goal is a 1-1 assist to turnover guy then just go with JJYou guys are awfully picky
There’s different kinds of turnovers. Bad shots can be worse than turnovers as can live ball turnovers. To me, bad shots can be worse than turnover. It can lead to a lot of bad things.Also saw he averaged 3 TO's a game, don't think that's too good based on his assist average.
Guess I should have phrased that different then lol. How about is that a good assist to TO ratio?Just don't look at anyone else we've been connected to so far lol
I don’t think the concerns are misplaced, he’s not really a PG… at least, not with those awful turnover stats and bare bones assist numbers.
If the goal is a 1-1 assist to turnover guy then just go with JJ
Worked for us in 2003. Yes i know we had MeloBoogie Fland is going to be a good player, but would we want a true freshman running the point? There was one starting freshman in the Final Four this year. The game today is changing. It’s hard to win big with freshman.
Today is a different world.Worked for us in 2003. Yes i know we had Melo
Boogie Fland is going to be a good player, but would we want a true freshman running the point? There was one starting freshman in the Final Four this year. The game today is changing. It’s hard to win big with freshman.
I would probably still roll the dice on him over the guys we've been connected to in the portal. But yes, getting a good, experienced PG would be perfect.Boogie Fland is going to be a good player, but would we want a true freshman running the point? There was one starting freshman in the Final Four this year. The game today is changing. It’s hard to win big with freshman.
Don't be so hard on yourself. You're just a skeptic.He's def got talent, but I'd be scared that it's a Judah redux (and I'm not trying to slam Judah). What I mean is what you're likely alluding to -- he's going to be growing/learning on the fly and doing that while trying to position himself for the draft while carrying the load of a lead guard with experienced players is a lot.
Again, kid seems talented. I'm torn. Can't see a portal PG that will be everything we need, but I'm terrified of a frosh just not being ready for the grind and responsibility. Maybe I'm just a cynic.
Highly doubt Boogie wears Orange. But if somehow he ended up here you throw him out there at PG and let him run. That’s a first class problem.Boogie Fland is going to be a good player, but would we want a true freshman running the point? There was one starting freshman in the Final Four this year. The game today is changing. It’s hard to win big with freshman.
Sorry. Didn’t mean to.You make it sound like it’s their job and they have more invested in it than we do.
We don't win the title without the legit PG, who was Billy E.Worked for us in 2003. Yes i know we had Melo
Try some mango."Old school" point guard, "combo" guard, whatever. Can you facilitate offense by actually running set plays for others? Do you have the ability to also score for yourself? Can you shoot at a reasonable clip?
This isn't hard for me.
In a heartbeatBoogie Fland is going to be a good player, but would we want a true freshman running the point? There was one starting freshman in the Final Four this year. The game today is changing. It’s hard to win big with freshman.
Who’s this guy and what’s he know lol
Who’s this guy and what’s he know lol
Looks like a couple of my seventh graders.