Notre Dame isn’t much different than us.
Torvik has said that continuity/retiring production plays a large part in his preseason numbers. I would imagine Kenpom’s algorithm operates the same way. ND brings I think everybody back so while I don’t agree with it the numbers make some sense.
Notre Dame added the Ivy League player of the year as a grad transfer.
If Pomeroy has ND where he does I think his metrics say they are better.
Just to clarify, you are saying that the HOF coach is unaware of the importance of the point guard in college basketball. Interesting hill to die on I will give you that.
So we ignore the evidence?
There is overwhelming evidence that clearly demonstrate he knows a thing or two about guards and their importance to the success of a basketball team. He's not perfect and a few recruiting cycles get messed up, yet he still wins games.
I love it. Harder schedule the better. More opportunities for Tier 1/2 wins. I hate being desperate for a resume-building win and there’s no or few opportunities.
Up until a very few years ago, Pomeroy didn't start rating teams until games had been played. Now, he is carrying over statistics from year to year. That requires projecting the impact of incoming recruiting classes, of experienced players snatched from the portal; and guessing which returners have (or haven't) progressed. I'm sure he has a statistical model that measures all of these factors, but, to me, it still seems like there's a lot of guesswork here.
Better than everyone here projecting every player on the roster is going to be better than their capable of.
Bit of a strawman argument there.
He must not be too good since he has Seton hall at #50 and they added the worlds greatest NBA prospect to some talent they already had. You would think they would be higher
So he went to worlds greatest nba prospect? Get a life.
Wanting an actual good PG to play has become we want the greatest NBA prospect.
Lazy
