KaiserUEO
2022 and 2x ESPN Tourney Challenge Winner
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 18,878
- Like
- 22,915
8 is EnoughWouldn't that be a First Eight instead of two First Fours?
The Great Eight?
The Hateful Eight?
Oceans 8?
Not too late 8Wouldn't that be a First Eight instead of two First Fours?
The Great Eight?
The Hateful Eight?
Oceans 8?
Basically you might eliminate the NIT and make all teams relevant. Win and advance. Dollar and a dream.Will it actually make that much more money? Does anyone watch those games they don't have a stake in the outcome? They're not even in any brackets
Winner, winner!!!More teams more dollars.
You think they get rid of the NIT?Basically you might eliminate the NIT and make all teams relevant. Win and advance. Dollar and a dream.
If 70 football teams can go bowling, 72 can join the ‘tourny’.
If you keep adding to the ncaat, how relevant is the nit.You think they get rid of the NIT?
Yes.You’re saying we should want to emulate a system that features such events as a “Cheribundi Tart Cherry Boca Raton Bowl” and “Bad Boy Mowers Gasparilla Bowl?”
That's a good point - I don't feel it's too relevant now. I feel like it's a tournament for fans of the teams that didn't make the NCAAs. Those will still exist if 4 teams get added to the dance.If you keep adding to the ncaat, how relevant is the nit.
If you keep adding to the ncaat, how relevant is the nit.
The regular season one-bid conference winners who lose in their tournament do get an automatic bid to the NIT now.Personally I think the NIT should be for Mid Majors who win their regular season and lose their conference tournament or the runners up in the conference tournament.