orange79
Internet Sleuth
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2011
- Messages
- 41,859
- Like
- 129,150
Read above.
It's about the essence of coaching and teaching.
It's about developing good study habits.
It's about attention to detail. Discipline. Paying attention to instruction. Eliminating the adverse effects of emotion.
When you have to do things every day that you might not want to do, it forces you to pay attention, to be alert - to value instruction.
Again, respectfully, I wonder if you have ever been involved in high level team sports competition.
So, last post for me on this, because I will never convince you to change your mind, just as you will never convince me to change mine.I just don't think you get it - I think you're being way too literal.
The comparison between the athletic performance of Oregon to that of our team at this stage in our program's development really misses the point - strikingly so.
And the notion that strict team protocol - espoused by coaches such as Joe Paterno, Vince Lombardi, Tom Coughlin, and John Wooden - means nothing as far as actual performance on the field, ignores their success.
Yes, insisting that Bill Walton cut his hair and that the UCLA players learn how to put on their socks a certain way, did not make them better athletes and probably did not improve their FT%, but it did in less direct ways improve their competitive performance by teaching them the value of attention to detail and the need to honor protocol.
I wonder whether you played or coached at a fairly high level of team sport competition.
I guess I will never understand how eliminating beards will automatically help the kids to develop good study habits and pay attention to instruction. Are you saying the kids now don't pay attention - how do they learn the play book? As alsacs stated above, kids should have fun playing the game. Apparently, that is anathema to the way you think the game (note the word 'game') should be played. And if you think I'm being too literal, read some of your posts to see what I am referring to. And the comparison to Oregon nowhere near 'misses the point'. Or is it your opinion that the type of student athlete SU attracts is fundamentally different than those that Oregon attracts. Comparing where Oregon is in its stage of development compared to SU misses the point - strikingly so. As does whether or not I (or anyone else on this board) have played or coached - at any level.