Cusesky8214
Living Legend
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2016
- Messages
- 11,739
- Like
- 37,955
Still think a National Champion would be a little chintzy with only 3 out of 5 Power Conferences playing ...and I'm not a fan of any other conference except the ACC
Just play and have fun, and see how good your team can be this year. I know I would be thrilled with that, since the alternative for many posters on this very Syracuse forum are calling for no football at all
LOL I read that quickly and thought I don't remember the B1G playing in any of those title games.and they have an excellent point because they have been represented in every title game EXCEPT 09, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19 and 20
I welcome and OSU or PSU players to transfer or walk on at CUSE
The ACC would need a punching bag like Rutgers to be anywhere near that level.Take away Clemson and the ACC is arguably not a power five conference. Would be very similar to the old Big East...
Thanks, Rutgers guy.Take away Clemson and the ACC is arguably not a power five conference. Would be very similar to the old Big East...
Take away Clemson and the ACC is arguably not a power five conference. Would be very similar to the old Big East...
Ohio State is the only team from the Big Ten since 1998 that has played in the National Title game.Take away Clemson and the ACC is arguably not a power five conference. Would be very similar to the old Big East...
But not as good as an NC in the bush.One meritless NC in the hand is better than no NC in the bush.
Take away Clemson and the ACC is arguably not a power five conference. Would be very similar to the old Big East...
Thanks, Rutgers guy.
Take away Rutgers and the B1G isarguablya much better conference.
If I read the Wildhack article right he said we're going to increase testing?
yes, Syracuse is going from what I think was twice a week in season to three times. Not sure what context the ncaa guy is talking about. Number of tests? Type of test? Length of time to get results?