Bad.Let's get things started. Najee Harris at #30 in both Kiper and McShay's new mocks this week. Discuss.
I'm usually 100% against RBs in rd 1 but at 30 I'm open to it. Obviously would rather lock in a player at a premium position on a 4+1 rookie deal but by 30 they are all picked over and you're looking at the 3rd tier guys at those positions. Feel like the value swings the other way somewhere around pick 24 and becomes safer to take a tier 1 player at a less valuable position like LB/OG/RB/S at 30.Bad.
I'm usually 100% against RBs in rd 1 but at 30 I'm open to it. Obviously would rather lock in a player at a premium position on a 4+1 rookie deal but by 30 they are all picked over and you're looking at the 3rd tier guys at those positions. Feel like the value swings the other way somewhere around pick 24 and becomes safer to take a tier 1 player at a less valuable position like LB/OG/RB/S at 30.
I would add DT to that list and probably also one more WR pick (doesn't need to be an early one but I wouldn't be mad if it was either).It's still not clear to me whether the terrible run game was a product of poor RBs, poor scheme, poor o-line or some combo of the three. My hope is the Bills spend some time this offseason trying to answer that question and adjust accordingly.
Personally I think the RBs are generally okay. Although after that drop I don't think I'll ever trust Singletary again... he's had more than that one drop, but that one literally changed the game. My initial thought is that the o-line is the bigger problem... we have good tackles but our interior line is no bueno in run blocking. Ford coming back *should* help but they invested a TON of money into Morse and I don't think that signing has worked out from a running game perspective. Allen had all day to throw most of the regular season, but that time disappeared in the playoffs.
I'd love to see Harris or that Clemson kid. But I think there is more bang for the buck w/ a o-line pick.
While I'm at it, other team needs: TE, DE, 2 LBs (assuming Milano is out), 1 DB, start thinking about Poyer/Hyde's replacements in a couple of seasons.
A tag to Milano is a non-starter isn't it because the LB tag is inclusive of the edge guys making a zillion dollars?I get it. I just think Moss is likely to be a good enough all-around back that an upgrade isn't really needed and I just don't really want to bother spending another premium pick on a RB for the 3rd year in a row. If McBeane still aren't happy with the RB room, I'd rather just go out and sign a cheap vet that can contribute (probably particularly in the passing game because Singletary is pretty much purely a runner and Moss is a solid all-around guy).
I think at least right now, I'm in the boat of wanting to either take Kadarius Toney at 30, or if he isn't available, try to trade down into the earlyish 2nd round and pick up an extra pick or two in the process.
I don't know too much about this year's prospects outside of the skill positions yet, but it sounds like there might be some LB options worth considering at 30 as well if we let Milano go, though I know Fairburn from The Athletic was speculating that the Bills might give Milano the tag.
It would be around $14-15 millionA tag to Milano is a non-starter isn't it because the LB tag is inclusive of the edge guys making a zillion dollars?
Wish they would fix that so that inside and outside guys were treated separately. Would drop down to 11ish and actually be workable.It would be around $14-15 million
On the flipside, if we ever get an edge rusher worth tagging, it helps us there lolWish they would fix that so that inside and outside guys were treated separately. Would drop down to 11ish and actually be workable.
My H0T Takes for the day...
- Milano is more valuable the Edmunds right now and bills d will suffer a lot if he walks
- Edmunds ends up on the Pats next year where Belicheat turns him into a hof’er
- Feliciano stays a Bill... Morse gets restructured or cut
- I think bills go oline w first pick
I don't see Milano back. He's a good player but he falls in the Jordan Phillips/Shaq Lawson category. Would rather see the Bills invest in DE/CB than LB.
We already can’t guard a tight end... letting our best coverage lb is only going to make that worse. We aren’t beating KC unless we can contain Kelce. Of course you could easily argue that it’s not like Milano did any better.He's a much much better player than those two were, but I agree it probably doesn't make financial sense to bring him back since he'll likely be one of the highest paid LBs in the league once he hits the open market. I agree I'd rather go get DLine or secondary help. Milano is going to be tough to replace though.
I'm not entirely sure what the correct answer is, but I know the Bills will almost certainly make Edmunds one of the highest paid LBs in the league and with everyone else that they plan to sign as well, they probably can't afford to do the same with Milano. We might be able to do the franchise tag and take it year-by-year with Milano until we REALLY need the money, but something's gotta give from a cap perspective.We already can’t guard a tight end... letting our best coverage lb is only going to make that worse. We aren’t beating KC unless we can contain Kelce. Of course you could easily argue that it’s not like Milano did any better.
The D was a disaster and only got better once Milano got back.
He's a much much better player than those two were, but I agree it probably doesn't make financial sense to bring him back since he'll likely be one of the highest paid LBs in the league once he hits the open market. I agree I'd rather go get DLine or secondary help. Milano is going to be tough to replace though.