This whole situation is insane. I'm trying to look at this as objectively as possible.
Witness comes forward and accuses BF of molesting him 20 years ago
He approaches SU about in 2002-ish
SU investigates, finds no wrongdoing, PS investigates, finds no corroboration
Sits on the shelves until PSU scandal
ESPN airs this "story" and interview
OK, so other than this guy accusing BF of this, what are the facts? There appears to be no witnesses, no evidence, no nothing as opposed to PSU, eyewitnesses, grand jury testimony, etc
I almost can't even believe this is happening. SU needs to put on the full court press and get national media members who despise the mothership to help out and get on the offensive. Unfortunately in the case of slander, i believe it has to be proven false, which in this case is seemingly impossible.