Coach Search Options after Autry | Page 30 | Syracusefan.com

Coach Search Options after Autry



As it feels like the board is collectively building a "case" for Josh Schertz, here's an data-backed example of real system, Red. They lead the country in closest distance for 2-point attempts, while being top 15 in 3 point %.

How do you take so many shots close to the hoop? System intent, scheme to open up shots, and coaching. A plan, a system, a coach with direction. He's our guy.

This is interesting data. South Florida also has great numbers. Just saying...
 
Here is a question.

Ive heard that because of the Autry contract buyout, if a move is made this season it may diminish the caliber of coach we can afford next year.

IF you knew one of these two to be true (this is unknowable, but its a discussion board and its just a speculative convo), would you rather...

1- Make a move now and go the cheap Cuse-alum route again or

2- Wait one more year and then have more money to spend on an established national winner?

The answer is not "they arent spending that anyway so make a change now"...I know they probably arent. But if you knew it would be one of these two options which would you choose?
 


As it feels like the board is collectively building a "case" for Josh Schertz, here's an data-backed example of real system, Red. They lead the country in closest distance for 2-point attempts, while being top 15 in 3 point %.

How do you take so many shots close to the hoop? System intent, scheme to open up shots, and coaching. A plan, a system, a coach with direction. He's our guy.

This is a good breakdown of Josh Schertz’s offensive system and philosophy. I’ve compiled some other articles and videos, and and have been planning to put together a detailed post summarizing Schertz, his background, successes and strengths, and why he’s probably the best candidate for Syracuse to hire as its next head coach. But this link is a good place to get started reading about his offense, which relies on overarching concepts and ideas to foster organized creativity and improvisation. He likens it to jazz or improvisational comedy. “It’s really teaching guys how to play and not plays. It’s like rhythm, not patterns,” he has said.
 
Here is a question.

Ive heard that because of the Autry contract buyout, if a move is made this season it may diminish the caliber of coach we can afford next year.

IF you knew one of these two to be true (this is unknowable, but its a discussion board and its just a speculative convo), would you rather...

1- Make a move now and go the cheap Cuse-alum route again or

2- Wait one more year and then have more money to spend on an established national winner?

The answer is not "they arent spending that anyway so make a change now"...I know they probably arent. But if you knew it would be one of these two options which would you choose?
If forced into that hypothetical, I would wait one more year. There's no qualified Cuse alum at the moment, so hiring one would mean resetting the clock for another 3 years before we can get serious and start the rebuild. 1 more year of Red would be quicker than 3 of another Cuse alum.
 
Well, it reads as South Florida is trying to do the same system (easy 2s and 3s) but 234th in 3PT% skews the ability to do so effectively. SLU is doing both at a high level, and the results speak for themselves.
That is true. This also falls into the category of the coach can only put them in the position to succeed. Similar to Marquette's data or you could argue that both programs need better talent, but the coaching isn't lacking.
 
Interested in Schertz. Offense, offense, offense. No idea what he is as a recruiter, but for basketball, I don't think it's as a big deal as football (you can't tell me Hurley, Oates, etc are these dynamic personalities like Fran Brown; they are outstanding coaches first). We need a COACH.
 
Here is a question.

Ive heard that because of the Autry contract buyout, if a move is made this season it may diminish the caliber of coach we can afford next year.

IF you knew one of these two to be true (this is unknowable, but its a discussion board and its just a speculative convo), would you rather...

1- Make a move now and go the cheap Cuse-alum route again or

2- Wait one more year and then have more money to spend on an established national winner?

The answer is not "they arent spending that anyway so make a change now"...I know they probably arent. But if you knew it would be one of these two options which would you choose?
Why did SU give a long term contract 3+ years to a coach who was unproven and doesn't appear to have been in demand?
 
Why did SU give a long term contract 3+ years to a coach who was unproven and doesn't appear to have been in demand?
Who says they did? He has a below average ACC head coach contract, at best middle of the ACC. Just because it’s more money than most people think it should be and he’s not earning it doesn’t mean that it’s some conspiracy.

We’ll know soon enough how serious Cuse is on paying for an in demand coach soon.
 
Hopefully JW and the admin are interested in him too and not just the board.

But as long as we are willing to spend and we don’t go the GMac route - I’ll be happy.

My one real requirement: you have to be a current head coach. I don’t want Seth Greenberg or Tim Crean. I also don’t want Luke Murray or some other assistant who’s never been a HC before. I think Murray is fantastic but we can’t risk it on another guy with no HC experience. Need someone who has ran a winning program before
 
For those curious, Schertz makes $2m plus incentives on a 6 year deal. The buyout for AA will be low-ish after this year. Buyout won’t matter, but the next pay grade will. Luke Murray they can get for AA salary. Schertz would be $3m+. Theres discussions occurring about AA. I’ll say that.
 
I still think we should give Matt Langel a look. Probably would come at a reasonable price and seems to know how to coach. Question would be can he recruit at this level.
 
For those curious, Schertz makes $2m plus incentives on a 6 year deal. The buyout for AA will be low-ish after this year. Buyout won’t matter, but the next pay grade will. Luke Murray they can get for AA salary. Schertz would be $3m+. Theres discussions occurring about AA. I’ll say that.
Discussion occuring about AA?
 

Forum statistics

Threads
175,886
Messages
5,275,455
Members
6,190
Latest member
OldBartman

Online statistics

Members online
278
Guests online
2,015
Total visitors
2,293


P
Top Bottom