Coach Search Options after Autry | Page 761 | Syracusefan.com

Coach Search Options after Autry

Listen I agree it’s sucked but let’s all calm down and see what happens.
Agree. If BB is real and is going to fix NIL and get the dome rocking again I’ll be giving and going more this year. That goes for gmac or Schertz.
 
Who’s to say this guy isn’t the basketball version of Dino? Turnaround artist who doesn’t stick around long enough to build a real track record.
I don’t have a crystal ball, and I wouldn’t care if he left PC after one year, but it was a great hire, and rumors and of course they are rumors but I have pretty good connection when it comes to only that coach PC is giving $13 mill a year in NIl, that my friends is significant
 
I don’t have a crystal ball, and I wouldn’t care if he left PC after one year, but it was a great hire, and rumors and of course they are rumors but I have pretty good connection when it comes to only that coach PC is giving $13 mill a year in NIl, that my friends is significant
I think Gerry gets to that amount tbh
 
I'm not typically a glass half-full kinda person, but I think most posters are viewing this all wrong.

Putting aside Autry's hire, we ended the season knowing we would need a new coach and luckily, there were some good young options out there.

McNamara was likely not in consideration initially, but his success this year cannot be ignored. He, of course, gets bonus points here for his time on The Hill (both as a player and coach). I think we all saw how hard his team played, and given the absolute half-azzed play and coaching we got as the season ended, that really resonates well too. We all know there are some negatives also (e.g., relatively little head coaching experience; comes from a tree of unsuccessful coaches and systems; Siena is the premier program in the MAAC [along with Iona]).

So we are either going to land a nice coach from outside of the program (my preference), or a hometown guy, with a winning track record, who seems to be on the rise.

The delta between basketball coaches is not nearly as big as many want to believe. Success is mostly a confluence of circumstances. I think whoever we get will be an improvement on where we are now, and that's what most important for the time being.
 
I'm not typically a glass half-full kinda person, but I think most posters are viewing this all wrong.

Putting aside Autry's hire, we ended the season knowing we would need a new coach and luckily, there were some good young options out there.

McNamara was likely not in consideration initially, but his success this year cannot be ignored. He, of course, gets bonus points here for his time on The Hill (both as a player and coach). I think we all saw how hard his team played, and given the absolute half-azzed play and coaching we got as the season ended, that really resonates well too. We all know there are some negatives also (e.g., relatively little head coaching experience; comes from a tree of unsuccessful coaches and systems; Siena is the premier program in the MAAC [along with Iona]).

So we are either going to land a nice coach from outside of the program (my preference), or a hometown guy, with a winning track record, who seems to be on the rise.

The delta between basketball coaches is not nearly as big as many want to believe. Success is mostly a confluence of circumstances. I think whoever we get will be an improvement on where we are now, and that's what most important for the time being.
Good post.
 
What was Providence's "public image" up until 15 minutes ago?
A bottom of the pack BE school who made a brutal hire, and they better get serious and get it right now or else they will be in the cellar of that conference for quite awhile.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,935
Messages
5,312,740
Members
6,214
Latest member
CuseCO

Online statistics

Members online
407
Guests online
4,394
Total visitors
4,801


Top Bottom