phil77
BC Prophet
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2011
- Messages
- 13,185
- Like
- 43,796
What is strange about making a terrible basketball hire and having to fire him at the end of the season? It happens other places.
I think it carries a little more weight than a bottom of the barrel bowl game considering you likely need to go through UNC, Louisville/Virginia and then DukeKey word is might. Not even sure that would do it at this point. That would be like Dino making a bowl at 6-6
No. Us winning the ACC tournament would be miles ahead of going 6-6 in football. Let's talk sense. Don't worry about it though. Could anyone see this team winning two games in a row in the ACC tournament? Let along 4 or 5Key word is might. Not even sure that would do it at this point. That would be like Dino making a bowl at 6-6
No. Us winning the ACC tournament would be miles ahead of going 6-6 in football. Let's talk sense. Don't worry about it though. Could anyone see this team winning two games in a row in the ACC tournament? Let along 4 or 5
Oddly, I think that is a fair statement.Coach options……I would take anyone other than Red right now
What?well, it isn't valued at what we all we would have thought seeing who is interested right now from what I hear. I'm surprised and sad about it.
OSU yes... Oregon maybe? I don't know what kid wants to sign up for school in Oregon only to spend all winter in the midwest? If Oregon was going to be a national power they would have been by now. Phil Knights money was always there in a much easier conference and they were never really a national threat under Altman other than two years of a f4 and elite 8I think Oregon and OSU will be topping this list soon. Actually agree with LSU being so low; not sure if they are going to try and go all-out for bball like some of the other SEC schools have been.
If Oregon wants to be serious about basketball they'll have their pick, if they don't have it already.OSU yes... Oregon maybe? I don't know what kid wants to sign up for school in Oregon only to spend all winter in the midwest? If Oregon was going to be a national power they would have been by now. Phil Knights money was always there in a much easier conference and they were never really a national threat under Altman other than two years of a f4 and elite 8
Was I not clear. Think say 12 years ago. Who would have wanted our job at that time. Now, the names I am hearing, it makes me shudder. And while the board is in love with BH, I think part of that is that he 1. isn't Red. And 2. gets his team to play hard. But 12 or 13 years ago, would a guy that hasn't one a game in the NCAA tournament be enough? I don't think so. And the other candidates, oh boy. I am actually glad the rest of the board isn't hearing the things I am. I said before, I would share them but it would be a neutron bomb to the board.What?
well, it isn't valued at what we all we would have thought seeing who is interested right now from what I hear. I'm surprised and sad about it.
We're going to be fine. The brand has definitely been damaged from the farce of the last hire, though. Almost exactly as some posters predicted.What?
And the other candidates, oh boy. I am actually glad the rest of the board isn't hearing the things I am. I said before, I would share them but it would be a neutron bomb to the board.
Thanks. The original message was confusing in how it was worded. I’ve heard some things as well and think we’ll be happy with who we get, even if it’s not the top name we would have gotten 10 years ago.Was
Was I not clear. Think say 12 years ago. Who would have wanted our job at that time. Now, the names I am hearing, it makes me shudder. And while the board is in love with BH, I think part of that is that he 1. isn't Red. And 2. gets his team to play hard. But 12 or 13 years ago, would a guy that hasn't one a game in the NCAA tournament be enough? I don't think so. And the other candidates, oh boy. I am actually glad the rest of the board isn't hearing the things I am. I said before, I would share them but it would be a neutron bomb to the board.
Was
Was I not clear. Think say 12 years ago. Who would have wanted our job at that time. Now, the names I am hearing, it makes me shudder. And while the board is in love with BH, I think part of that is that he 1. isn't Red. And 2. gets his team to play hard. But 12 or 13 years ago, would a guy that hasn't one a game in the NCAA tournament be enough? I don't think so. And the other candidates, oh boy. I am actually glad the rest of the board isn't hearing the things I am. I said before, I would share them but it would be a neutron bomb to the board.
To be fair, Hodgson is one of the hottest names in the country for all gigs, not just ours. And his interest in the position makes it all the more crucial for the AD to take advantage of this opportunity to get him, especially if the rest of the candidates are not up to snuff, as you mention.Was I not clear. Think say 12 years ago. Who would have wanted our job at that time. Now, the names I am hearing, it makes me shudder. And while the board is in love with BH, I think part of that is that he 1. isn't Red. And 2. gets his team to play hard. But 12 or 13 years ago, would a guy that hasn't one a game in the NCAA tournament be enough? I don't think so.
It was probably worse even 3 years ago. We can’t lose out on Hodgson.Was
Was I not clear. Think say 12 years ago. Who would have wanted our job at that time. Now, the names I am hearing, it makes me shudder. And while the board is in love with BH, I think part of that is that he 1. isn't Red. And 2. gets his team to play hard. But 12 or 13 years ago, would a guy that hasn't one a game in the NCAA tournament be enough? I don't think so. And the other candidates, oh boy. I am actually glad the rest of the board isn't hearing the things I am. I said before, I would share them but it would be a neutron bomb to the board.
Well, I will give you this, in my opinion, he is the best of the lot by a large margin. Could someone else emerge . Of course. I hope so.To be fair, Hodgson is one of the hottest names in the country for all gigs, not just ours. And his interest in the position makes it all the more crucial for the AD to take advantage of this opportunity to get him, especially if the rest of the candidates are not up to snuff, as you mention.
Red isn’t making $3m a year. I can assure thatConfused by the repeated Syracuse is cheap comments. It feels like to me JW has found budget as needed for football for example. Are people saying we are cheap because we won't pony up $8m per year or something? Most dont.
The top 25 salaries range from $3.8mm (Greg Gard Wisconsin)at 25 to over $8mm to Bill Self at Kansas. Only 12 coaches make over $5mm.
To me if Syracuse was "cheap" it would have to be less than $2mm maybe?
It is generally believed Red is making around $3mm per year. That means Syracuse would only be off $800k to be paying one of the top 25 salaries. Which they could easily accommodate.