RF2044
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 31,280
- Like
- 102,793
For me I want Cuse to be like Marquette and (hopefully) Michigan State. Both have veteran teams of guys they signed, developed, and they stayed.
Maybe you augment it here and there but I do feel even in the NIL age you need a core of multi-year program guys.
Agreed.
But then you need a system, and you have to recruit to that system, and have a coaching staff that develops players. And NIL goes toward taking care of your players, so they stay. And then you supplement with good system fits.
That's a winning approach, that doesn't require $6M NIL coffers just to be competitive.
The fallacy is that you need a huge NIL bank, that you're going to win consistently just by trying to swing for the fences every year, replacing huge chunks of the roster via the Portal, and that you as a program "can't" be competitive unless you have an NIL coffer the likes of which SEC programs have.
Hell, they sicken me, but look at uconn. They built the core, and they supplement the core. And they are back-2-back.
You need a good coach. You need a good system. And you need recruits to fit what you're trying to do. And then, after all that, you need NIL to keep players in-house, and to supplement your roster with CHOICEFUL portal additions.
What are we trying to do?
Last edited: