Don’t shoot the messenger. 2030 with Red??? | Page 3 | Syracusefan.com

Don’t shoot the messenger. 2030 with Red???

Seeing threads like this always makes me contemplate (a) should I be a good human and set people straight about obvious misinformation, or (b) take advantage of suckers and profit from their ignorance.
I get the nonsense angle. But….why? I’m not in media why would someone mention a specific date so affirmatively on a reputable site. I come in no snark. Genuinely confused if this is all 100% bs
 
I get the nonsense angle. But….why? I’m not in media why would someone mention a specific date so affirmatively on a reputable site. I come in no snark. Genuinely confused if this is all 100% bs
Just read this thread, all the faults have been laid bare. I firmly believe this was an AI-generated "story" with, at best, a quick look over by a human before he clicked publish. If it was actually written by a human, the guy may be the worst researcher on the internet. Everything he sourced was done incorrectly. The entire thing is hot garbage.

And the Sporting News is not a reputable site. It's an old brand that's now in the hands of PE ghouls who employ AI and ghost writers to aggregate and content farm.
 
I get the nonsense angle. But….why? I’m not in media why would someone mention a specific date so affirmatively on a reputable site. I come in no snark. Genuinely confused if this is all 100% bs

This could be his “source” for all we know. It’s the only other place I can find in a Google search that mentions 2030. He probably saw that, didn’t realize it was satire and went with it.

 
Last edited:
I don't think it is a spoof, fake, or satire account. It was an April Fool's Day Post Jeff.

Here's a recent post by Cardiac Cuse that may be of interest to everyone here (if it hasn't been posted here before):

 
Just read this thread, all the faults have been laid bare. I firmly believe this was an AI-generated "story" with, at best, a quick look over by a human before he clicked publish. If it was actually written by a human, the guy may be the worst researcher on the internet. Everything he sourced was done incorrectly. The entire thing is hot garbage.

And the Sporting News is not a reputable site. It's an old brand that's now in the hands of PE ghouls who employ AI and ghost writers to aggregate and content farm.
That’s hilarious how trashy Sporting News is now.
 
That article really is a Rorschach test of Syracuse fans.

If you immediately bought the 2030 and $13 million buyout stuff and got angry -- and didn't first think that it seems outlandish and you should wait to validate those things -- maybe step back and think about how you consume media, and how you might improve your media literacy.
 
That article really is a Rorschach test of Syracuse fans.

If you immediately bought the 2030 and $13 million buyout stuff and got angry -- and didn't first think that it seems outlandish and you should wait to validate those things -- maybe step back and think about how you consume media, and how you might improve your media literacy.
Agreed! Guilty. However this is the same university that selected Autry so I’m of the opinion bad decisions beget worse ones
 
That article really is a Rorschach test of Syracuse fans.

If you immediately bought the 2030 and $13 million buyout stuff and got angry -- and didn't first think that it seems outlandish and you should wait to validate those things -- maybe step back and think about how you consume media, and how you might improve your media literacy.
I remember Sporting News as a legit print when I was a kid.
Mike Decourcy used to cover the cbb. I guess times have changed.
 
Just read this thread, all the faults have been laid bare. I firmly believe this was an AI-generated "story" with, at best, a quick look over by a human before he clicked publish. If it was actually written by a human, the guy may be the worst researcher on the internet. Everything he sourced was done incorrectly. The entire thing is hot garbage.

And the Sporting News is not a reputable site. It's an old brand that's now in the hands of PE ghouls who employ AI and ghost writers to aggregate and content farm.
Yes it was def AI. Click the link for the tax source. The AI bot mixed up and was citing Dino Babers contract and salary info from a Syracuse.com article a year or two ago. Then somehow mixed in some Autry info and ended up with the craziness.
 
That article really is a Rorschach test of Syracuse fans.

maybe step back and think about how you consume media, and how you might improve your media literacy.
Or whether you should be a "messenger" for the Board
 
Unbelievable baseball coverage back in the day.
[/QUOTE]
Wasn't it originally primarily just baseball? Printed like a newspaper published in St. Louis I think. I used to build it once in awhile in the drug store. I think it used to include the box score of every MLB game.
 
Wasn't it originally primarily just baseball? Printed like a newspaper published in St. Louis I think. I used to build it once in awhile in the drug store. I think it used to include the box score of every MLB game.
Yep, for decades it was solely a baseball publication. I read it religiously in the 80s.

Shame what all those old print titles have been reduced to. But none of them could navigate the evolution from print to digital.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,595
Messages
5,267,126
Members
6,195
Latest member
Cuseman73

Online statistics

Members online
284
Guests online
3,525
Total visitors
3,809


P
Top Bottom