AZOrange
Living Legend
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 19,846
- Like
- 42,007
I hit Duke hard with -12.5. They were +900 which seemed off to meUp to 14.5
I hit Duke hard with -12.5. They were +900 which seemed off to meUp to 14.5
That's great, but don't be upset if we root for you to lose.I hit Duke hard with -12.5. They were +900 which seemed off to me
Hey me too!That's great, but don't be upset if we root for you to lose.
I would. Assuming Symir gets the majority of Buddy's minutes, you'll see better ball movement offensively and better perimeter defense. You'll even see shot restraint and pace improve. I suspect the game will be significantly tighter than the two previous blowouts. Perhaps 70-59, with Duke the victor.That has to be a joke. Right? They really want everyone to bet on Duke? Would anyone in their right mind bet on Syracuse? Does the Old Professor have something up his sleeve?
I think a lot of that makes sense. The bigger issue imo is down low. Their strength is our weakness.I would. Assuming Symir gets the majority of Buddy's minutes, you'll see better ball movement offensively and better perimeter defense. You'll even see shot restraint and pace improve. I suspect the game will be significantly tighter than the two previous blowouts. Perhaps 70-59, with Duke the victor.
I totally agree, Duke's on ball pressure gives us fits. Symir playing 30+ minutes definitely helps that situation. For Vegas to put out that line after two butt kickings and without our leading scorer and being severely short handed tells me volumes. We still can't stop them at all from scoring. It's too good to be true. But I still can't take the points.I would. Assuming Symir gets the majority of Buddy's minutes, you'll see better ball movement offensively and better perimeter defense. You'll even see shot restraint and pace improve. I suspect the game will be significantly tighter than the two previous blowouts. Perhaps 70-59, with Duke the victor.