Agreed.Jesse in the first half was a big factor in this game today. It was the real reason our bigs , especially Dolezaj was around at the end when we needed them. Great job Jesse!
Funny, Sid still found a way to get 5 fouls in the 2nd half after none in the 1st half (although I'll grant him the over the back call that fouled him out was BS).
Funny, Sid still found a way to get 5 fouls in the 2nd half after none in the 1st half (although I'll grant him the over the back call that fouled him out was BS).
You are correctOfficials look at Sid, see any contact and call a foul. After all, all the other officials did.
Officials look at Sid, see any contact and call a foul. After all, all the other officials did.
JB didn’t say anything specific about Edwards, but someone asked him about the freshmen who played in the first half (presumably referring to Edwards and Goodine). JB said something like “they’re not ready yet.” I agree with both your assessment and JB’s. I think having Sidibe and Dolezaj both in the game, with fresh legs, late into the second half, was a key to the victory.Not sure if I missed it but did JB say anything about Edwards play in the first half? Edwards is not our answer to winning directly but without his effort in the first half there is no way we have Sidibe for nearly all the 2nd half and Dolezaj for all the second half. I do agree that Sidibe and Dolezaj made the difference for Syracuse in the second half but with out Edwards plugging the hole for over 5 minutes in the first half, much less Sidibe and Dolezaj in the 2nd half. I want to give JB credit for the move but it look like he failed to even rcognize the contribution?
I don't disagree but guess what, during those 5 minutes Dolezaj and Sidibe picked up ZERO fouls.Edward did a great job, but he had no rebounds in 5 minutes. He is not strong enough yet...
We were down 11 at the half.....we are not going to win most games when we allow that to happen...I don't disagree but guess what, during those 5 minutes Dolezaj and Sidibe picked up ZERO fouls.
Without Sidibe and Dolezaj in the 2nd half do you think we make up those 11 points? Yes we were down but the key is Edwards plugged the hole, Dolezaj and Sidibe did not get fouls on the bench and Syracuse was ready to attack with a full first team in the second half! Winning the first half does not win the game.We were down 11 at the half...we are not going to win most games when we allow that to happen...
There is a difference between filling a need and being a strategy. Edwards filled a need in the first have that helped us win a game, but we are not good enough to spot teams points by not playing our best players in the first half.Without Sidibe and Dolezaj in the 2nd half do you think we make up those 11 points? Yes we were down but the key is Edwards plugged the hole, Dolezaj and Sidibe did not get fouls on the bench and Syracuse was ready to attack with a full first team in the second half! Winning the first half does not win the game.
I’m not clear on the logic here. “Playing our best players” is what caused the deficit in the first place. By having Edwards as an option to “hold the fort”, if you will- it allows us the ability to make a run later, w/out being hampered by foul problems or fatigue. If Edwards came in and stunk up the joint, then u sit him down and bring back your starters. But why not exercise the bench option and see if it works? Why wait until you have no choice? Why not do it throughout the year as a calculated maneuver? Imo, it’s just stupid NOT to do so.There is a difference between filling a need and being a strategy. Edwards filled a need in the first have that helped us win a game, but we are not good enough to spot teams points by not playing our best players in the first half.
WOW...needs and strategies! I thought we were trying to win a game?There is a difference between filling a need and being a strategy. Edwards filled a need in the first have that helped us win a game, but we are not good enough to spot teams points by not playing our best players in the first half.
If the player on the close is close in ability as the starter, but I don't see that now.I’m not clear on the logic here. “Playing our best players” is what caused the deficit in the first place. By having Edwards as an option to “hold the fort”, if you will- it allows us the ability to make a run later, w/out being hampered by foul problems or fatigue. If Edwards came in and stunk up the joint, then u sit him down and bring back your starters. But why not exercise the bench option and see if it works? Why wait until you have no choice? Why not do it throughout the year as a calculated maneuver? Imo, it’s just stupid NOT to do so.
Buddy had 1 in 38Edward did a great job, but he had no rebounds in 5 minutes. He is not strong enough yet...
Buddy doesn't go to the boards he leaks out for a hit ahead 3, Joe goes to the boards and does a very good job only had 2 tonight but he normally gets around 4.Buddy had 1 in 38