Briancuse
Living Legend
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2014
- Messages
- 32,701
- Like
- 42,521
How do you take nd over bamaND is safe.
Either Miami or Bama.
How do you take nd over bamaND is safe.
Either Miami or Bama.
Yep walked out of that game with the same feeling as only a couple others, those being the ‘92 Miami loss and the 1998 Tennessee loss, recognizing the major missed program defining opportunities.What a shame we lost to Stanford last year. We could have been in the playoffs in this dumpster conference
SEC fans thought 3 loss Bama deserved to be in last season too. Michigan proved that was a fantasyI agree, I can’t imagine them excluding Bama. It seems like the choice mostly likely to haunt the committee. The only difference between Bama and ND/Miami is a championship game loss to arguably the best team in the country in Georgia. I can’t believe I’m almost advocating for them, but just saying people would have a legitimate point, and the SEC is highly influential.
I agree, but I do think Bama’s case is a little stronger this year, and they generate more money than Miami, but I know the committee doesn’t think about those factors.SEC fans thought 3 loss Bama deserved to be in last season too. Michigan proved that was a fantasy
100%.This entire championship weekend system is broken with the playoff. It just muddies the waters more. These games do nothing but complicate the playoff picture. Additionally, Indiana just had a program defining victory, but might be rewarded by seeing Ohio State again.
This is the best summary i have seen of Miami vs. Alabama with Miami bumping Bama (from the Athletic newsletter):ND is safe.
Either Miami or Bama.
yes its not that hardThis is not hard. Duke jumps into standings at #23 for beating Virginia. James Madison stays below them…beating Troy does not move the needle. Tulane is #11, Duke #12.
Sun Belt complaining will be ignored. Chesney’s heart is not in sticking around another month. They will get clobbered if he tries to coach two teams.
Alabama gets in over Miami. The ACC is not going to complain, as they were gifted Duke. The same thing could happen to the B12 some year… so no need to fret over an 8-5 team getting in.
Plus, this will be the impetus to reform the playoffs again. CCG tiebreaker will be playoff committee ranking or P4 wins.
Yep - so many things to list here, but right now the arcane tie-breaker rules loom large. I get they were trying to determine a "real" championship game base on real outcomes, but that thinking is so 1980's.All this talk
Acc is getting no teams in.
Its their own fault
Seeing how inept this conference is really has made me realize that their 2003 expansion was success by accident. And also made me realize that the Big East, with far better leadership, could have poached Maryland and set themselves up for another decade.Yep - so many things to list here, but right now the arcane tie-breaker rules loom large. I get they were trying to determine a "real" championship game base on real outcomes, but that thinking is so 1980's.
You need to get as many teams as possible in the playoff. Again, blinders by ACC management.
I think the paradigm is changing. I think HS recruiting won't be as important as transfers in the future.It's crazy that none of the ACC teams that recruit top 15 classes every single season could top these two scrub schools. Lol
We actually contributed to Duke's being in the game. Of the tied schools, Duke's opponents had the best conference record at .500. We were 7-1 and only played Pitt of the other tied teams. {Deep sigh}If Miami doesn’t make it the ACC commissioner needs to be fired for their stupid tiebreaker. This was the worst case scenario for the ACC.
The committee will put those two on opposite sides of the bracket so they wouldn't meet until CFP title game. Indiana will be #1 seed and tOSU won't fall below #3This entire championship weekend system is broken with the playoff. It just muddies the waters more. These games do nothing but complicate the playoff picture. Additionally, Indiana just had a program defining victory, but might be rewarded by seeing Ohio State again.
ERob should have been fired that night.Yep walked out of that game with the same feeling as only a couple others, those being the ‘92 Miami loss and the 1998 Tennessee loss, recognizing the major missed program defining opportunities.
That said, keeping the glass half full, looking at what Indiana and Duke just did, really think we are on our way to the same
CristobalMiami is so annoying. They were up 20-17 at SMU with the ball with a few minutes left. Just one more first down, and the ACC doesn't get humiliated nationally, and we don't have snooze through James Madison losing at Oregon by 50 points.
For them to have Cam Ward and Carson Beck in back to back seasons with zero playoff appearances is awful.
That won't happen til late in the playoffs.This entire championship weekend system is broken with the playoff. It just muddies the waters more. These games do nothing but complicate the playoff picture. Additionally, Indiana just had a program defining victory, but might be rewarded by seeing Ohio State again.
Mario.Miami is so annoying. They were up 20-17 at SMU with the ball with a few minutes left. Just one more first down, and the ACC doesn't get humiliated nationally, and we don't have snooze through James Madison losing at Oregon by 50 points.
For them to have Cam Ward and Carson Beck in back to back seasons with zero playoff appearances is awful.