JeremyCuse
Renowned lacrosse analyst
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2011
- Messages
- 41,721
- Like
- 54,431
Huge break for Marist, Army throws it away with no pressure on the man up, brutally bad turnover
Both teams look sloppy now. Marist should be killing clock. Instead, they're making dumb mistakes with the ball.15-9 Army, Marist getting sloppy and not valuing possession.
Still 17-9 with 2 minutes to go.17-9 another goal from X
Sounds like a good strategy. Army seemed to have trouble defending Marist's quick attackmen, who were initiating from behind the goal. Could be a good sign for Cook? Of course, the cold, rainy conditions probably didn't help Army at all.Have to assume based off of this film SU is going to invert a crap ton on Sunday even though that's not our MO. Its pretty much all Marist has done unless Army is double polling or I am missing something.
Sounds like a good strategy. Army seemed to have trouble defending Marist's quick attackmen, who were initiating from behind the goal. Could be a good sign for Cook? Of course, the cold, rainy conditions probably didn't help Army at all.
Good call. If I read the IL box score correctly, his save percentage was only 37% against Marist.I would pump the brakes on the whole goalie with 80% saves thing. He is good, but he didn't beat out Barretto last year and wasn't handed the job in the fall, he had to win it. UMASS took a lot of poor shots, they did not look good at all. NJIT is very weak. Rutgers is weak at the midfield and was dominated at the x. I think the Orange has to run its offense and not settle for poor shots--that play's into Army's hand.
Sounds like a good strategy. Army seemed to have trouble defending Marist's quick attackmen, who were initiating from behind the goal. Could be a good sign for Cook? Of course, the cold, rainy conditions probably didn't help Army at all.
Marist turns the ball over 19 times, only clears 20-26, and still blows out Army. That is just stunning.
View attachment 176922
I didn't see the whole game, but the IL box score suggests that it was the attackmen who were coming from X and scoring. It shows that 4 attackmen were among Marist's top 5 scorers, including Embury (4-3), Weinman (3-0), Pirreca (2-3) and Musso (2-0).Once thing that may be beneficial to Army is that if the Marist mids were the ones inverting that maybe difficult for SU to replicate as our mids don't really do that save for Dordevic and I haven't seen him do it this year. Curry only usually dodges from up top and occasionally the wing ala Costabile, Trimbo does't dodge much period and Dordevic I think may have inverted a few times his frosh year but he certainly hasn't so far this season. I think if your SU you have to get Dordevic Curry, Lipka and Quinn practicing inverting the next few days.
I didn't see the whole game, but the IL box score suggests that it was the attackmen who were coming from X and scoring. It shows that 4 attackmen were among Marist's top 5 scorers, including Embury (4-3), Weinman (3-0), Pirreca (2-3) and Musso (2-0).
I didn't see the whole game, but the IL box score suggests that it was the attackmen who were coming from X and scoring. It shows that 4 attackmen were among Marist's top 5 scorers, including Embury (4-3), Weinman (3-0), Pirreca (2-3) and Musso (2-0).
LOL just posted the same thing. Very interesting. Will give the SU staff a lot to contemplate on how to attack army especially assuming that Alberici will adjust.