- Joined
- Aug 16, 2011
- Messages
- 98,179
- Like
- 195,260
Who knows about the relationship between these guys. What we have seen is that they don't have any chemistry together on the court
Define chemistry.
Who knows about the relationship between these guys. What we have seen is that they don't have any chemistry together on the court
Ok my real answer, Sherm and Roe played off each other very well as did Jonny and Devo.Tammi Terrell and Marving Gaye
A form of science that studies the properties of matter.Define chemistry.
Ok my real answer, Sherm and Roe played off each other very well as did Jonny and Devo.
I hope that Mintz and Joe and find a groove together as on paper they should do well. They are both talented and as you point out I didn't see anything to make me believe that they are out of sorts with each other. I actually think the issue is Bell. He doesn't bring much to the table if he isn't hitting and his inability to drive is an issue. I would replace him with Copeland, and I believe the " Chemistry" would be significantly improved.
Mintz was showing his disgust during the play!I didn't get to see much of the game, but I did see a play in the second half with Joe and Judah on a 2 on 1 fast break. Instead of making an easy pass to Judah for a layup/dunk, Joe kept it himself. Missed the layup but got the foul call. Judah was visibly displeased and instead of helping Joe off the ground, he turned away in disgust. On its own, maybe not a huge deal, but those two sure don't seem to be clicking.
I didn't get to see much of the game, but I did see a play in the second half with Joe and Judah on a 2 on 1 fast break. Instead of making an easy pass to Judah for a layup/dunk, Joe kept it himself. Missed the layup but got the foul call. Judah was visibly displeased and instead of helping Joe off the ground, he turned away in disgust. On its own, maybe not a huge deal, but those two sure don't seem to be clicking.
Well,I haven’t seen a second of play so far this season, but clearly there’s an issue. Somewhere.I watched the 2nd half again this afternoon. Saw absolutely nothing to indicate any issues. Like I said above, it’s a board created thing. Joe only shot a few times the 2nd half and only one could even be considered a “bad” shot and not a senior only focused on himself.
I didn't get to see much of the game, but I did see a play in the second half with Joe and Judah on a 2 on 1 fast break. Instead of making an easy pass to Judah for a layup/dunk, Joe kept it himself. Missed the layup but got the foul call. Judah was visibly displeased and instead of helping Joe off the ground, he turned away in disgust. On its own, maybe not a huge deal, but those two sure don't seem to be clicking.
Well,I haven’t seen a second of play so far this season, but clearly there’s an issue. Somewhere.
To be fair Joe hasn’t made that pass in his previous 3 years either, usually a missed layup or getting stuffed was the result, I’m guessing the lack of size on the defense is how it was a foul instead of the normal result.Mintz was showing his disgust during the play!
Girard absolutely should have passed the ball ahead to the player in better position. If he got cut off, Mintz could have passed it back for an open shot for Girard... But would Mintz have passed it back? This is where trust looks like an issue.
I remember feeling the same way Mintz did over Girard's decision during the play. He salvaged it with the free throws, but this was an example of Girard's bad point play that has been frustrating many of us for a generation.
The biggest problem, of course, was Mintz and his body language.
Define chemistry.
Shhh. Narratives.I rewatched the first half and all I saw was Joe passing the ball. Didn’t look selfish to me.
Joe was passing. Judah was overly pressed all game.I rewatched the first half and all I saw was Joe passing the ball. Didn’t look selfish to me.