JarHeadJim
I have never won sheet!
- Joined
- Aug 21, 2011
- Messages
- 127,864
- Like
- 394,271
You have always sucked and you always will! good luck in the B10
You have always sucked and you always will! good luck in the B10
To play pop-psychologist, the fact that you posted for people to stop posting -- and also called them "Rutgirls" -- just shows that you have as deep a feeling about them too. You just posted after they've shown well. I'm buffeted to post this by a six-pack -- and that I told a Rutgers grad this morning that Louisville isn't that good.Sorry, but Rutgirls posts are just stupid.
They are playing a pretty good team a helluva lot better than we did at our place this weekend.
The day this board becomes de-infatuated with every other post about R******s, the better it will be. Enough.
You have always sucked and you always will! good luck in the B10
To play pop-psychologist, the fact that you posted for people to stop posting -- and also called them "Rutgirls" -- just shows that you have as deep a feeling about them too. You just posted after they've shown well. I'm buffeted to post this by a six-pack -- and that I told a Rutgers grad this morning that Louisville isn't that good.
1) you state that you came to the board after seeing the Rutgers score; 2) no one would frequent someone who advertises as a "pop-psychologist"; 3) I like to see the Giants lose (that's with two Syracuse grads on board), but I don't need to post about it; and 4) you need to explain yourself, which my DeVry psychology degree tells me that you're compensating for being seen as interested in Rutgers.I have a deep feeling for Syracuse Sports which is why I visit here.
God forbid I turn it to ESPN during the Giants halftime , see the score and visit this board to see a higher percentage of these posts versus ACC ones.
So...I am kinda saying I don't think you would be a great street paychologist.
1) you state that you came to the board after seeing the Rutgers score; 2) no one would frequent someone who advertises as a "pop-psychologist"; 3) I like to see the Giants lose (that's with two Syracuse grads on board), but I don't need to post about it; and 4) you need to explain yourself, which my DeVry psychology degree tells me that you're compensating for being seen as interested in Rutgers.
Long story short: If you don't care about a subject, don't post about it.
No problem -- it's free. But I just counted the last ten posts -- at 10:50 PM -- three were about the 'Ville/Rutgers game (you know, the only major college game on, and which a college football board might be interested in ... particularly if they have a past and/or future history with the teams); three were about the NC State game; and four were about the Giants, Shafer's behavior, etc.Thanks for the posting advice.
I'll stick by my original proclamation of protest against the plethora of posts on this subject. Thanks for sharing your viepwoint.
No problem -- it's free. But I just counted the last ten posts -- at 10:50 PM -- three were about the 'Ville/Rutgers game (you know, the only major college game on, and which a college football board might be interested in ... particularly if they have a past and/or future history with the teams); three were about the NC State game; and four were about the Giants, Shafer's behavior, etc.
"Plethora" -- a great, great word -- deserves more.
Edit: I forgot to mention that one of the "Rutgers" posts was actually about Bridgewater.
I'll take that every day over being disingenuous, cupcake.You are a major league dork, bro.
It's only a game because lville can't get out of their own way. I think they've had the ball inside the 15 yard line five times and only have 3 points to show for it.
the stats are nuts it's like 500 yards to 200 yards. We had more yards against Clemson.
Sorry, but Rutgirls posts are just stupid.
They are playing a pretty good team a helluva lot better than we did at our place this weekend.
The day this board becomes de-infatuated with every other post about R******s, the better it will be. Enough.
I ended up watching the second half, and the difference between Clemson and these 2 teams is really eye opening imo. Watching Rutgers and Louisville reminded me of where we are right now. We are still a Big East team trying to compete in the ACC. I honestly didn't see much difference between us and either Rutgers or Louisville overall (Louisville has better receivers).
it sucks when that happens to you but I'm glad we're not trying to build a program around that smoke and mirrors horsesh!tLast year out SU gained them 418 to 237, 1o point turn on the blocked chippy FG in a 8 pt loss. Ugh.
I ended up watching the second half, and the difference between Clemson and these 2 teams is really eye opening imo. Watching Rutgers and Louisville reminded me of where we are right now. We are still a Big East team trying to compete in the ACC. I honestly didn't see much difference between us and either Rutgers or Louisville overall (Louisville has better receivers).