Harvard Preview | Syracusefan.com

Harvard Preview

OrangeXtreme

The Mayor of Dewitt
Joined
Aug 15, 2011
Messages
255,163
Like
479,581


HarvardLAX3.jpg
 
i see this is already our second game with same date / same time as hoops. i just quickly looked up the duke, virginia and notre dame schedules for basketball and lax and although there were a couple on the same days none were even close to the same times. is this just another ACC screw job for syracuse ?
 
Last edited:
i see this is already our second game with same date same time as hoops. i just quickly looked up the duke, virginia and notre dame schedules for basketball and lax and although there were a couple on the same days none were at the same times. is this just another ACC screw job for syracuse ?

Since were playing at Harvard, and the Ivy League controls their home schedule, I'd say no.
 
i see this is already our second game with same date same time as hoops. i just quickly looked up the duke, virginia and notre dame schedules for basketball and lax and although there were a couple on the same days none were at the same times. is this just another ACC screw job for syracuse ?
I guess in developing the schedule Gary knew real lacrosse fans would rather watch his team than Adrian's.
 
I have to say this game makes me nervous. Harvard is no push over, and obviously last year's games made for stressful watching. Add to the fact that this is SU's first game on the road, outdoors and in not great weather and there is a lot to worry about. Syracuse is a good team though, and I have confidence they'll pull this out, but it won't be easy.

Harvard has some very athletic players, especially on attack. Jack Spidell and Teddy Malone combined for 15 points in the two matchups against Syracuse last year. The good news is that Harvard no longer has Sam King to occupy the teams best defender. I think that means Riley Figuerias will take Malone and Billy Dwan will guard Spidell, but well see. Spidell (6'3) is bigger than Malone (6'), so that's why I think Fig will take on Malone. The third attacker is Nathan Cobery, who I am not super familiar with, but stands at 5'11. I am guessing that means Chuck K will bump down again to close.

Harvard is pretty top heavy when it comes to offensive production (Malone and Spidell have combined for almost half the points Harvard has produced this year). Small sample size, but the goal has to be to stop those two.

Obviously a big storyline has been face-offs in these last two matchups. I think Syracuse has won something like 83% of the draws, but obviously that hasn't led to run away success against the Crimson. Owen Umanski has been the main FOGO for Harvard this year, and in two games is a little above 50%. He's taken all but five draws for the Crimson. He was only 1-12 last year against the Orange (didn't play in the tournament), so hopefully John Mullen can again exploit that matchup.

Harvard has a very good goalie in Graham Stevens, so SU will have to be careful with their shooting. He finished below 50% against SU last year, but again, both games were one-goal finishes. So an uptick in his performance but just a few percentage points could go a long way.

And speaking of goalies, Jimmy McCool was not good against Harvard in either game last year, he finished with just 10 saves total (getting pulled in the first game). He will have to play better, especially if Harvard wins a few more draws and Stevens ups his game.

Other random thoughts - Harvard plays up tempo (to mitigate the face-off disparity), but that leads to turnovers, in two games they have two more turnovers (39) compared to Syracuse (37) who has played three. Also, I don't care how SU wins this game, but I would like to see someone other than Spallina step up on offense - he leads the team in scoring by 10 points. Syracuse has shown good depth, but someone else needs to produce on a big level.

Overall, on paper I think SU should win this game. They matchup well with Harvard's offense (two star attackmen vs two star defensemen) and hopefully Mullen can run riot at the face-off X. But last year's games put the scare in me, so I am definitely not taking anything for granted.

Last thing, the mental aspect of this game is something to watch for. First game as number one, start of a six game road trip. Would be really great for SU to start off with a win as to keep momentum going. How this team handles success will be telling.
 
I have to say this game makes me nervous. Harvard is no push over, and obviously last year's games made for stressful watching. Add to the fact that this is SU's first game on the road, outdoors and in not great weather and there is a lot to worry about. Syracuse is a good team though, and I have confidence they'll pull this out, but it won't be easy.

Harvard has some very athletic players, especially on attack. Jack Spidell and Teddy Malone combined for 15 points in the two matchups against Syracuse last year. The good news is that Harvard no longer has Sam King to occupy the teams best defender. I think that means Riley Figuerias will take Malone and Billy Dwan will guard Spidell, but well see. Spidell (6'3) is bigger than Malone (6'), so that's why I think Fig will take on Malone. The third attacker is Nathan Cobery, who I am not super familiar with, but stands at 5'11. I am guessing that means Chuck K will bump down again to close.

Harvard is pretty top heavy when it comes to offensive production (Malone and Spidell have combined for almost half the points Harvard has produced this year). Small sample size, but the goal has to be to stop those two.

Obviously a big storyline has been face-offs in these last two matchups. I think Syracuse has won something like 83% of the draws, but obviously that hasn't led to run away success against the Crimson. Owen Umanski has been the main FOGO for Harvard this year, and in two games is a little above 50%. He's taken all but five draws for the Crimson. He was only 1-12 last year against the Orange (didn't play in the tournament), so hopefully John Mullen can again exploit that matchup.

Harvard has a very good goalie in Graham Stevens, so SU will have to be careful with their shooting. He finished below 50% against SU last year, but again, both games were one-goal finishes. So an uptick in his performance but just a few percentage points could go a long way.

And speaking of goalies, Jimmy McCool was not good against Harvard in either game last year, he finished with just 10 saves total (getting pulled in the first game). He will have to play better, especially if Harvard wins a few more draws and Stevens ups his game.

Other random thoughts - Harvard plays up tempo (to mitigate the face-off disparity), but that leads to turnovers, in two games they have two more turnovers (39) compared to Syracuse (37) who has played three. Also, I don't care how SU wins this game, but I would like to see someone other than Spallina step up on offense - he leads the team in scoring by 10 points. Syracuse has shown good depth, but someone else needs to produce on a big level.

Overall, on paper I think SU should win this game. They matchup well with Harvard's offense (two star attackmen vs two star defensemen) and hopefully Mullen can run riot at the face-off X. But last year's games put the scare in me, so I am definitely not taking anything for granted.

Last thing, the mental aspect of this game is something to watch for. First game as number one, start of a six game road trip. Would be really great for SU to start off with a win as to keep momentum going. How this team handles success will be telling.

Your last paragraph is key to me. How does SU handle success? At times last year it appeared they would struggle to follow up on big performances/wins. I liked ColdAngers note about how the locker-room was after the Maryland win, should bode well for Sat but you never know until the game starts.
 
These recent heartbreaking MD losses early have been followed by an even more disappointing loss the following week or 2 later, with the Army loss in 2024 and Harvard loss last season. Hoping this big win early has the opposite effect. We go in with some confidence instead of being antsy and nervous following a recent early loss.
 
The combination of V. Bol Brown and Kittle has fundamentally altered how opponents can attack us. Teams simply haven’t been able to generate consistent production inside — look at Maryland and St. Joe’s as examples. Entry feeds and crease touches have been limited, and even when opponents do manage to penetrate, they’re typically met by the physical presence of Figgy, Dwan, and Chuck being probably the most physical kid on our defense. That interior resistance has reduced the need for McCool to steal games; he’s had timely moments, but he hasn’t had to carry an excessive load because the defense in front of him has been structurally sound.

Offensively, the most noticeable leap has been Joey’s development. He’s clearly operating at a higher level — more confident, more decisive, and more efficient. What separates this group from the last three seasons, though, is the depth and balance of the second midfield line. That unit brings speed, athleticism, and quick decision-making, which prevents defenses from overloading Joey and Leo as primary scorers. Hahn, Bear, Hottle, and others have taken meaningful steps forward, absorbing pressure and extending possessions.

The result is a more dynamic offense. Rather than relying on isolation from one or two premier scorers, we now generate threats from multiple initiation points. Being able to invert or feed Bear and let him win downhill is a legitimate structural advantage — it forces slides early and distorts defensive rotations. That kind of versatility makes the offense significantly more difficult to scout and scheme against than it has been in recent years
 

Forum statistics

Threads
174,606
Messages
5,268,226
Members
6,197
Latest member
NickMar

Online statistics

Members online
216
Guests online
4,433
Total visitors
4,649


P
Top Bottom