The kids wouldn't tank for Allen to make Hunt look good, would they?
Hunt has the poise to change a play, look off a receiver, or tuck it under his arm and run, a real read option offense QB. He will have some growing pains, but will be a great college QB by the time he leaves.
The kids wouldn't tank for Allen to make Hunt look good, would they?
The kids wouldn't tank for Allen to make Hunt look good, would they?
During Allen's 3 series all the inside runs were being stuffed. With Hunt we're ripping off 5-8 yards. With Allen we missed several passes. With Hunt we're either making completions or he's running.
Totally different execution from what seems to be similar plays.
I missed the first 4 minutes of 2nd half. Hope they shut Rome down.I would put Allen back in soon. Hunt is clearly our guy now without question, but I think putting in Allen would be a good idea to get his confidence back up (we always need a viable backup), and to not risk injury to Hunt.
This isn't a defense of Allen nor not to say Hunt didn't look great. But those first 3 series the runs were sans Smith for some reason and then Hunt comes in and it's all Smith. As to the routes, I didn't see any seam or crossing routes those first 3 series like I did after that. It's like we have 2 different offenses.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you sure? I coulda swore Smith got a couple carries. We didn't make a first down so there weren't a ton of plays to be run.
Yes, he did. He's the starter. He started the game out there.
Are you sure? I coulda swore Smith got a couple carries. We didn't make a first down so there weren't a ton of plays to be run.
On the routes, who knows at this point. A couple times Allen was totally locked in on one guy. Who knows what other routes were being run? Maybe the play calling looks better because Hunt actually sees the field?
Human centipede polaroidsI know it's Wagner, but you have got to be kidding.
What the heck were Shafer, CK, and Lester seeing?
Also, the SU defense knows every play the SU offense runs.One caveat is that the QB is not ever hit in practice. Once they go near QB1 the play is dead. No improvisation occurs in practice. That being said, Terell still looks much more comfortable running the team. His arm is weaker in tight windows but I could care less. No tractor beam eyes. Sold. Guarantee Bud's headline tomorrow is "The Hunt for Syracuse's Starting Quarterback is Over". Guaranteed.
Its freaking wagner. Lets see it against a real team
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - http://tapatalk.com/m/
The kids wouldn't tank for Allen to make Hunt look good, would they?
This isn't a defense of Allen nor not to say Hunt didn't look great. But those first 3 series the runs were sans Smith for some reason and then Hunt comes in and it's all Smith. As to the routes, I didn't see any seam or crossing routes those first 3 series like I did after that. It's like we have 2 different offenses.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Its freaking wagner. Lets see it against a real team
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - http://tapatalk.com/m/
i asked this in the other thread but how cant you ask that question?
i asked this in the other thread but how cant you ask that question?
Obviously Hunt is a better fit for the offense & that was apparent last week.It is completely absurd. Hunt just looks so much more comfortable with the offense. He checks down better, he runs better (I don't care who's faster). This is his team now - and pretty much should be until he graduates.