TheCusian
Living Legend
- Joined
- Sep 24, 2012
- Messages
- 22,782
- Like
- 33,677
Millhouse said:of course, but i don't expect it. we gotta make some choices. i think it's easier spend money on an offensive coach and occasionally get lucky on defense than the other way around. 128 teams last year, I broke into groups of 8, and got the average wins for top 8 offense, top 8 defense, 9-16 offense, 9-16 defense, etc if you're top 8 in offense, you win more than being top 8 in defense. likewise for 9-16, 17-24, 25-32, 33-40, 40-48 from there down, it flips the other way 8 of the next 10 ranges. if you don't think you can be good at both, and you want to be good at something, this seems to show it's a little better to try to be good at offense. nothing earthshatteringly definitive here, not pretending that it is
Yeah - I'm familiar with your position on the matter . We're dealing with a perennially good defense and coaching now and until that changes, I think that's the model we're shooting for. I hope it works and Lester is revelation and our playmakers make a jump... That's the reality of our situation. (And for the record - I love how our defense plays. For me - it's fun to watch. Wish it brought more W's).
If Lester fails, we'll end up with new coaches in two seasons - with a new, hopefully really smart and savvy AD at the helm.