Full_Rebar
All American
- Joined
- Jul 10, 2013
- Messages
- 4,074
- Like
- 4,220
Shotgun on 1st and goal from the 1 with a 240-lb QB. Clearly the football gods didn't take that too kindly- loss, penalty, dropped TD.
Regardless of the read the play design, calls for the RB to run parallel there. How do I know? Because he does it every time they run it. They can run a zone read where the RB starts with his momentum going north/south not east/west. Other teams do it.
Shotgun on 1st and goal from the 1 with a 240-lb QB. Clearly the football gods didn't take that too kindly- loss, penalty, dropped TD.
I never screamed for a spread offense.Good god, people scream for spread offenses and then get mad when we, like nearly every other spread team, works from the shotgun deep in enemy territory.
That has always been the complaint of the spread. That sneak worked against Notre Dame. If you are under center and hand the ball to AAM on that play, you get stuffed too...
I never screamed for a spread offense.
Hunt isn't good, but McD isn't helping him. This is a running team- go strong at the goal line and punch it in.
Who's his coach?GMC's playcalling cost 2 points, but Hunt's decision-making and lack of field awareness cost the team at least 3 points and likely more.
The QB can't throw a swing pass accurately, passes up a sure TD to throw a laser right to the safety who was attacking the route and locks in completely on one WR.
A QB needs to be recruited badly.
totally disagree. mcd gets paid. hunt is a raw athlete trying his best to play qb. its not his fault he is the best we have. hunt has won us games if put in the right situations, i cant say the same for mcdThere is blame for both. Hunt is the bigger problem.
I mean, a QB can't throw a swing pass to a wide open WR. That's on the QB. The QB tries to call a timeout with no timeouts left. That's on the QB.
McDonald calls a great play and Hunt throws a laser right to the safety, thus ensuring a TD call gets Louisville a FG.
If you think GMac is the biggest problem, what plays do you run for a QB that can't throw an accurate pass beyond 5 yards (and inside 5 yards is 50/50)? And oh yea, your OL will only occasionally block when you run the ball.
Lester.Who's his coach?
totally disagree. mcd gets paid. hunt is a raw athlete trying his best to play qb. its not his fault he is the best we have. hunt has won us games if put in the right situations, i cant say the same for mcd
all of them, he's the qb. if he gets the blame in the losses the he gets the credit for the winsLester.
What game did Hunt win for us in the ACC last year? Boston College, where a great play call from McDonald got the win?
all of them, he's the qb. if he gets the blame in the losses the he gets the credit for the wins
sorry to hear that. i'm notBut, doesn't that count for McDonald too? That is why I am confused.
sorry to hear that. i'm not
goes back to putting the kids in a position to succeed. don't ask TH to throw the 5 step drop, 15 yard out to the wide side of the field. just give the kid a chance. granted, our oline doesn't help a whole lot.So we've established Hunt isn't a good QB. Why design an offense that relies so heavily on him? In the first 4 games he's attempted nearly 30 passes per game, and that's with him missing half of one game. And with the zone read runs, he reads the defense and determines whether to give or keep the ball. Why would a good OC place so much responsibility on such a clearly bad player?
So we've established Hunt isn't a good QB. Why design an offense that relies so heavily on him? In the first 4 games he's attempted nearly 30 passes per game, and that's with him missing half of one game. And with the zone read runs, he reads the defense and determines whether to give or keep the ball. Why would a good OC place so much responsibility on such a clearly bad player?
B/c this offense (personnel wise) is extremely limited. Hunt's biggest strength is his elusiveness, so the offense has to utilize that (which is a read option offense). I don't know there is an offensive system that can work with this personnel against ACC teams.
You can try and be a power running team, but the OL has regressed. Hickey had his best game of the year tonight and still had some issues. Interior line may as well have been non-existent, mainly Miller. With Broyld and Estime out, WR's can't get separation against press coverage and hit the slants. But, they can't block on bubble screens either.
Also, nowhere did I say GMC is a good OC. I am saying more of the offensive woes rest with the QB position then the playcalling (and OL is high up on that list as well). However, the OL actually pass blocked well tonight in creating a pocket (which also may be b/c Ville wanted to keep Hunt in the pocket).
People railed on Hackett and he all of a sudden became a good OC when he had a NFL QB under center (b/c that is what a power run/play action style relies on, a NFL style QB). I think McDonald's system has a better chance at being successful consistently in college, but needs more time to get players in. The cupboard was bare offensively, especially at WR and QB. I think our OL recruiting has been bad.
We are transitioning from a power run team to a finesse spread team. We are putting square pegs in round holes overall. However, if we have another schematic shift, we will need to restart that as well.
My biggest issue with the offense? We don't have a single coach with OL experience. Game is won in the trenches.
We're never going to get players to run this offense with it looking so dysfunctional so regularly. McDonald needs to be creative and I don't think he knows how to be. Auburn basically used a RB at quarterback all year last season. If we're using Hunt for his mobility, we should just take one of our faster RB's, teach him how read a zone read play and let's do our best Auburn impression with multiple RB's in the backfield. Before anyone says, "We'll never be Auburn, we don't have their players," guess what, we'll never be as good as any of the best offenses because they all have better personnel, but we have to do something different. Rick Rod essentially did the same thing with Pat White at WVU.B/c this offense (personnel wise) is extremely limited. Hunt's biggest strength is his elusiveness, so the offense has to utilize that (which is a read option offense). I don't know there is an offensive system that can work with this personnel against ACC teams.
You can try and be a power running team, but the OL has regressed. Hickey had his best game of the year tonight and still had some issues. Interior line may as well have been non-existent, mainly Miller. With Broyld and Estime out, WR's can't get separation against press coverage and hit the slants. But, they can't block on bubble screens either.
Also, nowhere did I say GMC is a good OC. I am saying more of the offensive woes rest with the QB position then the playcalling (and OL is high up on that list as well). However, the OL actually pass blocked well tonight in creating a pocket (which also may be b/c Ville wanted to keep Hunt in the pocket).
People railed on Hackett and he all of a sudden became a good OC when he had a NFL QB under center (b/c that is what a power run/play action style relies on, a NFL style QB). I think McDonald's system has a better chance at being successful consistently in college, but needs more time to get players in. The cupboard was bare offensively, especially at WR and QB. I think our OL recruiting has been bad.
We are transitioning from a power run team to a finesse spread team. We are putting square pegs in round holes overall. However, if we have another schematic shift, we will need to restart that as well.
My biggest issue with the offense? We don't have a single coach with OL experience. Game is won in the trenches.