cliftonparksufan
Iggy Award Czar/Co 2020-21 Iggy Award Winner PPG
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2011
- Messages
- 17,921
- Like
- 32,065
Needless to say, I am pretty hyped.
I love how active we are on defense. Amazing how many hands we get on passes and shots. On offense so far, it is like watching the Varsity scrimmage the JV.If we take it to teams like this, and press, play man and zone... I will be tickled pink.
We have a bunch of horses that are meant to run. If this team sits in zone and tries to play half court offense, it will be a disservice to their athletic prowess and we will again have an early March exit.
Oh how quickly we forget teams of the past.
09-10 would roll this team by the way. That was an absurdly unselfish team.
I guess there is no quantifiable way to win the argument, but it's still a fun discussion.
To me, Jackson/Arinze are the biggest difference up front. Just think they would go like 18-22 from the floor (2-15 from the line) against any combination of Melo/Kieta/Xmas.
Wes then > Joseph now
Scoop/Trich Now > Scoop Tiche then
Rautins/Southerland...BOMBS AWAY...but gimme Rautins for the leadership.
Needless to say, I am pretty hyped.
you bring up a good point. This team hasn't played enough yet to make its own identity, which is something the 2003 and 2010 teams oozed. I'm sure many would disagree with these analogies and descriptions, but to me the '03 team was fun to watch because it had elements of college hoops-style play (2-3, etc.) but also had elements of the league (explosive star)... The 2010 team was the best college team one could ask for: balanced play, leadership, no super-egos, solid, consistent... This team could be (a), (b), both, or neither, we don't know yet. But I can't wait to find out.Depends on your subjective definition of "favorite". 2003 and 2010 teams were special for many reasons, some of which are perhaps beyond words. This team is nowhere near those two.
you bring up a good point. This team hasn't played enough yet to make its own identity, which is something the 2003 and 2010 teams oozed. I'm sure many would disagree with these analogies and descriptions, but to me the '03 team was fun to watch because it had elements of college hoops-style play (2-3, etc.) but also had elements of the league (explosive star)... The 2010 team was the best college team one could ask for: balanced play, leadership, no super-egos, solid, consistent... This team could be (a), (b), both, or neither, we don't know yet. But I can't wait to find out.
It's a bit premature since we only beat Manhatten & Albany. But I feel what you're saying.
This is crazy talk IMO! I'm not sure how long the people in this thread have been following SU basketball but the 88-89 team with Sherm, Billy, DC, Stevie, and Dave Johnson...Now that was the all time best team and the most fun to watch!
I will wait to call this an elite team until we play a team that will be in the NCAA tourney... Pitt beat this team by even more than we did