Gabjon
All American
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2011
- Messages
- 4,569
- Like
- 4,289
I agree with much of this. First time getting to the board after that debacle yesterday. A thread after DePaul was debating the talent on this team. If it wasn't clear then it sure is clear now. There just isn't much, imo. They are a bunch of role players mostly and I thought this months ago. I don't care what the recruiting rankings were. Talent means you shoot well. Talent translates into good offensive execution. We cannot do anything against a good defense, period. I couldn't believe MCW turned it over AGAIN with that jump in air- 180- pass backwards stunt. Now, some blame probably has to be on the coaching staff although it is hard to say. The sets we run vs zone especially are . Georgetown had some really great sets. Maybe there are good strategies being implemented in practice and they can't grasp anything? I don't know. It is hard to watch. Never seen anything like it. I absolutely think we could be on the 7 or 8/9 line if we go one and done in NYC. Our quality wins really aren't impressive. Frankly, I would like an 8 for a chance to play a #1. Then again, this team is probably broken mentally.
Yeah most people don't understand that ranking services rank players based on athletic ability over or higher than players with more basketball skill. The idea is that basketball skill can be taught while athletic ability can't, but some players just don't develop and some players take longer to develop than others. The result of this is many times the more skilled basketball players are ranked lower than the more athletic guys who can't play.