capeorange
All Conference
- Joined
- Dec 2, 2011
- Messages
- 2,626
- Like
- 6,643
Ha! We sure as heck wouldn't shoved around in the paint.My vote would be for Rhino. Put him at any position, I bet he excels.
Ha! We sure as heck wouldn't shoved around in the paint.My vote would be for Rhino. Put him at any position, I bet he excels.
Good reply!!!!!Easy: Bowie
I will make a guess.... bell ringer?What did this kids Great Grandfather do for a living?
Maybe having a football player as a walk on is the secret...
Isn't that JG3? Surprised he hasn't thrown a football pass for an alley-oop.
Not sure you can credibly say you're good with 8 or 9 players after previously blaming scholarships lost from sanctions for hurting the program.
the target needs to be players that will be here for 1 year...if they wanna go hard for 22 recruiting (which I think they do).Not sure you can credibly say you're good with 8 or 9 players after previously blaming scholarships lost from sanctions for hurting the program.
If he played more than 7 players consistently, that would be less of an issuethe target needs to be players that will be here for 1 year...if they wanna go hard for 22 recruiting (which I think they do).
Who are the grad transfers out there that would be willing to come even without guaranteed playing time???
well i think it is bc the idea that bench players and players who dont play are likely to leave so they arent a good investment of time and resources. Why stock up your bench with braswells and newtons if they will just bounce anyway...i dont think the size of the rotation is the issue bc theres always going to be players outside of the rotation no matter how many are in it.If he played more than 7 players consistently, that would be less of an issue
CR wouldve f_d around and got a triple-doubleI think half the board would have put up double digits against BC this last season (maybe the last few seasons).
CR wouldve f_d around and got a triple-double
One option though is JB’s decision - the other effects the quality of players you can even get or keep, if sanctioned.Not sure you can credibly say you're good with 8 or 9 players after previously blaming scholarships lost from sanctions for hurting the program.
Then we need to rethink our defense.I think coaches may rethink spending so many resources and time on recruiting players and rely more on the portal. Spending three years recruiting a player and then they up and leave after one year is not a wise investment. It should cause some pause in their thinking.
,
I think coaches may rethink spending so many resources and time on recruiting players and rely more on the portal. Spending three years recruiting a player and then they up and leave after one year is not a wise investment. It should cause some pause in their thinking.
,
Two years is clearly the max window for contributing players to want to show what they can do. Those who can do something will leave. Those who don’t get a chance will leave. Those who remain probably aren’t good enough to win at the highest level. That’s the framework to work within it seems. The model will continue to shift as the clear one-year window guys are choosing to bypass entirely at a higher level. It’s not super tricky to assess and adjust to. Doesn’t mean it’s fun but it’s pretty clear.I think coaches may rethink spending so many resources and time on recruiting players and rely more on the portal. Spending three years recruiting a player and then they up and leave after one year is not a wise investment. It should cause some pause in their thinking.
,