Those that signed Letters of Intent - as Coleman did - don't really have a choice do they?
So for example, say Coleman was recruited by and came to Cuse because of Fine ... he couldn't back out once something like this happens?Only if there is a coaching change. Then, I believe, they can get out of the LOI.
recruits can ask for a release at any time, but programs are very hesitant to grant them.I'm not sure that's true, I think they're locked in.
Technically speaking, a coaching change does not free a kid from his letter of intent. You sign with the school, not the coach. But oftentimes the school will let the kid out of his commitment if it is apparent the kid really does not want to play for the new coach.
DC2 says he is taking a wait and see approach.
He was looking to be a Bruin, right?It would be SU's option to let DC2 out of his commitment. Not DC2's choice. (Remember Jason Hart).
Since JB and Hopkins will be cleared of any wrongdoing ... DC2 has nothing to worry about.
IIRC, it was a convoluted thing wherein he initially expressed interest in UNLV but there were rumors that UCLA was his real preference . . . but it's been so long my memory of the details is real hazyHe was looking to be a Bruin, right?
He was looking to be a Bruin, right?