CIL
All Conference
- Joined
- Aug 14, 2011
- Messages
- 3,113
- Like
- 10,309
I get it, but on the flip side if you needed an elective heart procedure done that had an 85% survival rate you'd probably take it.
my kid had an ‘elective‘ procedure done that had a 2% mortality rate and none of the professionals batted an eyelash for recommending it be done.
Agreed, and in a vacuum they make sense. But the point is those are “elective”.
Sadly, COVID is an extremely contagious virus (most likely 2x the flu from that aspect) that can infect people whether they “elect” to get it or not.
I had it in July - and I am a healthy 41 year old. I exhibited very few symptoms. No cough, just a stuffy nose and a minor fever. Oddly enough, my lungs showed a little scarring and now I cough a
little after working out. I cough after a good laugh. Hopefully I’ll heal up and that goes away. But for some people that if it now be the case.
It’s an extremely curious virus that leads to disease that we still don’t know enough about. These long haulers have antibodies (autoantibodies) that actually attack their own bodies.
At some point we’ll figure it all out, but it isn’t as simple as 99 percent survive it and move on. We need to avoid an overrunning of the hospital systems, where providers are forced to chose who gets Remdesivir vs others, or who gets the ventilator, etc.
If it were as simple as 99.5 percent, and everyone in the US gets it, that’s still 1.6 million US citizens dead.