orangejunkie
Starter
- Joined
- Sep 4, 2011
- Messages
- 1,368
- Like
- 1,406
I would think that Howard W. would get more favorable playing time at a school like UB, Siena, Canisius, etc. I'm surprised he didn't get any offers from those type of schools.
I want to give players that had Covid the benefit of the doubt.My $.02 (and just compiling from various articles, watching games, and their season and post season trajectories): Covid really did a number on Joe and Buddy. It took a long time for them to get their strength and stamina back, especially Joe, given his asthma.
Last year’s regular season numbers should not be seen as career defining or indicative of who they are as players.
I want to give players that had Covid the benefit of the doubt.
But when I do that, I have to question of Covid affected them so much, why on earth the coach was loading so many minutes on those players.
It's almost like having 4 potentially playable scholarship guards might be a good thing for a roster.This was the question that bugged me too. I mean in fairness, Richmond never looked fully healthy to me either with all the sideline cycle work so maybe we had 3 guys not 100 pct at G?
I can certainly attest to what it can do to you. If anything it's your focus associated with the physical ailments and then continues after physical symptoms disappear.
To my eye, Kadary was the definition of what a college PG should be. He was the best true PG we have had since Ennis.What’s funny about this thread, besides it becoming the 199th thread about Joe when it is a JBA thread, is the discussion about PGs and combos guards and recruiting so many combos and trying to make them PGs. Kadary wasn’t a PG. He showed he could play it. He was listed as a combo and even a wing. In fact, a couple places like 2-4-7 listed him as a SF.
He played point at BrewsterWhat’s funny about this thread, besides it becoming the 199th thread about Joe when it is a JBA thread, is the discussion about PGs and combos guards and recruiting so many combos and trying to make them PGs. Kadary wasn’t a PG. He showed he could play it. He was listed as a combo and even a wing. In fact, a couple places like 2-4-7 listed him as a SF.
What’s funny about this thread, besides it becoming the 199th thread about Joe when it is a JBA thread, is the discussion about PGs and combos guards and recruiting so many combos and trying to make them PGs. Kadary wasn’t a PG. He showed he could play it. He was listed as a combo and even a wing. In fact, a couple places like 2-4-7 listed him as a SF.
If MCW isn’t a pure PG what is he?
Scoop Jardine is a PG as well.
He played point at Brewster
It's almost like having 4 potentially playable scholarship guards might be a good thing for a roster.
Almost.
I'm not so sure.I mean the Irish jig was worth a few points still...
I think the reality of having that on a roster now will be that it's not the case with the portal
To my eye, Kadary was the definition of what a college PG should be. He was the best true PG we have had since Ennis.
Even this guy thought so:
Boeheim recently said that the 6-foot-5 Richmond is perhaps the team’s most impressive newbie in its 2020 class, calling him a “really good point guard.”
Kadary
He played point at Brewster
I'm not so sure.
I mean, maybe for us.
But not all coaches are as set on who can earn minutes, or play as short a rotation.
I think this is a weird year because it has the combo of a) extra eligibility due to the Covid year and b) the first time immediate eligibility for transfers is available.Yeah I honestly think it's not even about that anymore. We will see where it lands but there a ton of teams who won't go that deep or deeper unless they run 3 guard lineups. The 4th guy wants to be the third guy is what I mean.. not even splitting with the third guy... And of course the third guy doesn't want it to be 3a/3b.. so one of them says it's portal time. At least that is my take from looking at what has happened and how teams aren't filling their rosters out
Yeah, i hear you, you had multiple points. But I was responding specifically to this:that wasn’t the point.
Kadary wasn’t a PG.
I know super talented kid.that’s where he ended up. But not where he played when we first started watching him. Even Griff said he could play 3 positions for SU.
More of a combo guard.So, JBA is being considered as a prospective point guard? Just trying to nudge the conversation back to the original topic.
Yeah, i hear you, you had multiple points. But I was responding specifically to this:
MCW played 10 minutes a game as a point guard on a 30-1 team.MCW was a combo guard who we recruited as a PG and spent a year waiting and learning and was a great PG for us. When he was recruited he wasn't a PG and neither was Scoop. I have no clue the point you are trying to make still when we have continued to pursue combos to convert them as PGs. Honestly you are really making this all about Joe and Kadary while throwing in all this other stuff that isn't accurate. What else besides the recruiting analysts and HS roles do you need?
Your point was recruiting true PGs..I mentioned we have at least two since 09 despite our best years being behind the stewardship of converted PGs. You are bouncing all over after that including throwing the roster management stuff, claiming things that weren't said. As a program we have had some misses in the Combo to PG conversions for sure. I mean my first post on this separate topic was clear.
Stop it.when we started our recruitment of him. I’m not sure he played any in HS and only started playing it when at Brewster and still some analysts called him a combo and griffin said he could play 3 positions for SU. That doesn’t fit people’s definition of a pure PG although that’s what he became for the most part.