Your not wrong on enrollment numbers but it's more of a factor in football. Now if the football team can get ranked in 18 and 22 during the season, there is no excuse for the basketball team to not just match but easily exceed that.
I agree, but it's still a factor, and I have a feeling it's going to become more of a factor going forward as more and more money pours into college hoops.
You're probably going to see more SEC and B1G schools rising to that second tier of blue bloods as a result. They're going to be able to buy themselves coaches and teams. What's going to stop them? Pick your favorite coaching candidate. What happens if we offer them $3.5M and Georgia offers them $7M? What happens when SEC and B1G schools that haven't really invested in a top basketball program do so and then start playing in NBA arenas or building bigger arenas on campus?
The landscape is changing, and our beloved program is a spectator watching it change as our dinosaur head coach makes snarky comments about the meteor.
And this "if the football team can then there's no excuse" logic is missing a few things. First, that's not how it works. Babers is a pretty good head coach getting pretty close to the max out of our program, and we need to nail the basketball hire.
Further, in the last five years (and we all know that's a friendly sample size for YOUR position not mine), they've been ranked in three of five seasons, peaking at #12. They've been ranked post-season once. Pre-season once. That's not a level of success we would find remotely enjoyable for our basketball program. We don't need to match it or exceed it, we need to exceed it by a LOT to maintain the status quo.
From 1972 to 2017, Syracuse basketball was ranked in 44 of 45 seasons. Looking more recently, we reached the top 10 at some point in the season in 11 of 15 years from 99-00 to 2013-14. Top 5 in 7 of 14. So from '99 to '14 we had legit national title hopes more often than not.
It's obviously easier for us to succeed at basketball than at football for structural reasons, but a lot of those reasons are evaporating and the landscape is shifting to favor the schools sitting at the big boy table as far as the money is concerned.
We've got to stop watching and adapt to the new lanscape. One of the most important things we need to do is admit that this is not going to be automatic or easy, and there *are* going to be available excuses. The path of least resistance that we've been on is going to be Boeheim handing it off to Autry or another assistant/former assistant who runs the program similarly to the way Boeheim has run it because that's what he wants. The school could easily do this and make excuses.
That path leads to mediocrity and trying to bring the program back from the dead in five years in a landscape where the top 25 is littered with SEC and B1G schools awash in money that we can't even hope to match.